2003
DOI: 10.1071/as03021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding AGB Carbon Star Nucleosynthesis from Observations

Abstract: Recent advances in the knowledge of the evolutionary status of asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars and of the nucleosynthesis processes occurring in them are discussed, and used to interpret abundance determinations for s-process elements, lithium and CNO isotopes in several types of AGB stars. We focus our attention mainly on carbon-rich AGB stars. By combining these different constraints we conclude that most carbon stars in the solar neighborhood are of low mass (M ≤ 3M ⊙ ), their abundances being a consequ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wallerstein & Knapp 1998). In fact, the most effective way of distinguishing between these two spectral types is to compare the intensity of some metallic lines (less prominent in CH-type stars) and, mainly, the intensity of s-element lines which are well known to be enhanced in CH-type stars (Keenan 1993;Abia et al 2003;Goswami 2005). An additional problem concerns the derivation of the temperature subtype.…”
Section: Spectral Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wallerstein & Knapp 1998). In fact, the most effective way of distinguishing between these two spectral types is to compare the intensity of some metallic lines (less prominent in CH-type stars) and, mainly, the intensity of s-element lines which are well known to be enhanced in CH-type stars (Keenan 1993;Abia et al 2003;Goswami 2005). An additional problem concerns the derivation of the temperature subtype.…”
Section: Spectral Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this hypothesis one might argue that the carbon enrichment that we currently observe was a consequence of mass transfer prior to the coalescence. However, it is extremely difficult to form carbon stars from mass transfer at near solar metallicity (Abia et al 2003;Masseron et al 2009, although a few exceptions seem to exist, e.g., BD +57 • 2161, see Začs et al 2005), thus there is very little or no space for the mass transfer scenario. The second scenario (carbon excess in the original gas cloud) is also ruled out because one should expect to find carbon stars of near solar metallicity at earlier evolutionary stages (main sequence, turn-off, sub-giants stars etc.).…”
Section: Evolutionary Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dust-driven winds (radiation pressure due to large luminosities) then enrich the ISM with these elements. Abia et al (2003) show that solar-metallicity AGB stars with C/O∼1, and a C/O>2 are considered extreme. Nuclear synthesis and evolutionary models show that only low-metallicity AGB stars would produce C/O=10 (Abia et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abia et al (2003) show that solar-metallicity AGB stars with C/O∼1, and a C/O>2 are considered extreme. Nuclear synthesis and evolutionary models show that only low-metallicity AGB stars would produce C/O=10 (Abia et al 2003). Given the low abundance of carbon-rich, nearly-sun-like stars (Fortney 2012), carbon-rich planets around those stars most likely must be linked to the disk evolution rather than to a primordial C/O>1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, carbon stars are unlikely to form by mass transfer at near solar metallicity mainly because of the high solar oxygen abundance to be surpassed (Abia et al 2003), although a few exceptions seem to exist (e.g. BD +57 • 2161, see Začs et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%