2010
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Merging in the common envelope and the origin of early R-type stars

Abstract: Context. Binary systems experiencing one or two common envelope episodes during the red giant branch or the Hertzsprung gap phases can produce a single star, evolving along the Hayashi track, as a final outcome. Even if these objects are expected to be very common in nature, a proper description of their evolution and physical properties is still missing. Moreover, this scenario (red giant merging scenario) has been invoked as the progenitor systems of early-R stars, by assuming that the physical conditions de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A helium WD merging with a red giant, itself with a helium core, followed by mixing during helium ignition in a rapidly rotating star, may be the answer. Population synthesis models predicted that there are sufficient CE mergers to explain these stars (Izzard et al, 2007), and subsequent detailed modelling confirmed that in some cases, this may indeed be the case (Piersanti et al 2010; Zhang & Jeffery 2013). The former study adopted a two-pronged approach combining 3D hydrodynamics and 1D implicit codes; see Section 4.2.1).…”
Section: Curious and Complex Phenomena With A Possible Binary (Or Plamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A helium WD merging with a red giant, itself with a helium core, followed by mixing during helium ignition in a rapidly rotating star, may be the answer. Population synthesis models predicted that there are sufficient CE mergers to explain these stars (Izzard et al, 2007), and subsequent detailed modelling confirmed that in some cases, this may indeed be the case (Piersanti et al 2010; Zhang & Jeffery 2013). The former study adopted a two-pronged approach combining 3D hydrodynamics and 1D implicit codes; see Section 4.2.1).…”
Section: Curious and Complex Phenomena With A Possible Binary (Or Plamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In particular, for the gravitational plus rotational potential we adopt the approximation by Kippenhahn & Thomas (1970), i.e. the radial component of the centrifugal force is averaged over a sphere (see Piersanti et al 2003Piersanti et al , 2010Tornambé & Piersanti 2013). In addition, a corrective term for the radiative temperature gradient is included in the energy transport equation (Endal & Sofia 1976).…”
Section: Algorithm and Input Physicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, the two possibilities are not mutually exclusive; the stars probably represent the sites of new grain formation, which in turn help "seed" new populations, and the connection can become self-reinforcing! Moreover, alternative explanations for this subpopulation, including stellar evolution processes (mixing or production from rotation, convection, unusual AGB phases or He-flashes), stellar mergers or mass transfer, all appear to make predictions in serious conflict with the observations (Izzard et al 2007;Zamora et al 2009;Mocák et al 2009;Piersanti et al 2010). It is much more natural to assume the stars are simply "primordially" enhanced in the species most abundant in large grains (if a mechanism to do so exists); the other mechanisms above would still act, of course, and modify the abundances actually measured, but they would only have to explain secondary characteristics like the N enhancement in these stars believed to result from the CN cycle and He-burning (relatively easy to produce; see Zamora et al 2009).…”
Section: Carbon-enhanced Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%