2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding adherence to the CardioMEMS pulmonary artery pressure monitoring system for heart failure: A qualitative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These differences could be explained by cognitions of patients regarding the efficacy of the intervention and the usability of the intervention [75]. Moreover, low health literacy or simply a lack of knowledge about the syndrome could also contribute to non-adherence [76][77][78]. In clinical practice, one should therefore educate patients about the importance of disease management with medication, invasive therapy, cardiac rehabilitation, and care pathways [65,79].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences could be explained by cognitions of patients regarding the efficacy of the intervention and the usability of the intervention [75]. Moreover, low health literacy or simply a lack of knowledge about the syndrome could also contribute to non-adherence [76][77][78]. In clinical practice, one should therefore educate patients about the importance of disease management with medication, invasive therapy, cardiac rehabilitation, and care pathways [65,79].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the CardioMEMS approval trial, 10 after 6 months there was still an average of 1.27 days between transmissions, and >80% of patients sent daily transmissions in the follow‐up study. 11 One smaller study noted that patients’ perceived adherence was less than actual adherence with IHM transmissions, reporting a daily transmission range of 19% to 99%, 20 and another reported more heart failure events with increased number of days between transmissions. 21 In our cohort, only 3 (18%) patients had transmission rates similar to the larger IHM trials, and as noted <50% of HFHs had IHM transmissions within 1 week of hospitalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the CardioMEMS implant [43,44], this subcutaneous implant is less invasive, and once the gateway is installed, data transmission will not require any commitment (a priori) on the part of the patient. It is already known that adherence to self-care is an important issue in the field of chronic conditions [45], including heart failure [46][47][48]. Therefore, it seems interesting to use low-invasive implants to deliver medication [49] or, in our case, to monitor patients living with heart failure.…”
Section: Pros and Cons Of An Implantable Monitoring Devicementioning
confidence: 99%