2016
DOI: 10.1177/0961000616654960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Undergraduate information behaviors in thesis writing: A study using the Information Search Process model

Abstract: The study investigates whether information-seeking behavior models and theories obtained in previous research are applicable to more complex tasks. It also aims to gather students' opinions on the importance and helpfulness of various traditional and online information sources in their thesis-writing process. This study would help to develop a better understanding of the roles and impacts of these information sources in the current networked academic infrastructure. Inspired by the Information Search Process m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, the names of the dimensions of ASISP do not correspond with the names of the stages in Kuhlthau's ISP model; this can be linked to the differences between the cultures and the educational systems (Çakmak, 2016). This result is consistent with the findings of Chaura (2015); Krubu et al (2017), andWu et al (2017). Chaura (2015) found that inconsistent with Kuhlthau, university students do not feel anxious, uncertain, confused or doubtful regarding ISP's initiation stage and they do not think to quit whenever they are not successful in finding the required information in the conclusion step of the process.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For this reason, the names of the dimensions of ASISP do not correspond with the names of the stages in Kuhlthau's ISP model; this can be linked to the differences between the cultures and the educational systems (Çakmak, 2016). This result is consistent with the findings of Chaura (2015); Krubu et al (2017), andWu et al (2017). Chaura (2015) found that inconsistent with Kuhlthau, university students do not feel anxious, uncertain, confused or doubtful regarding ISP's initiation stage and they do not think to quit whenever they are not successful in finding the required information in the conclusion step of the process.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, when the scale items were being created in the present study, these three elements were treated as attitude's elements. However, while Kuhlthau (1983), as well as the previous studies (Haley & Clough, 2017;Kracker, 2002;Kracker & Wang, 2002;Krubu et al, 2017;Stewart,Seifert & Rolheiser, 2015;Wu et al, 2017) used different qualitative and quantitative techniques to investigate students' ISP over the tasks assigned to the students (research assignment-essay, thesis writing, group assignment, library and internet search etc. ); the students were not assigned a task in the present research (such as essay, writing, library or internet search).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sekiz farklı veri seti test edildikten sonra geleneksel arama motorlarına göre hassasiyet oranı %97 oranına ulaşılmıştır. Wu, Dang, He ve Bi (2017) Çinli lisans öğrencilerinin tez yazımında çeşitli geleneksel ve çevrimiçi bilgi kaynaklarından yararlanmaları konusunu incelemiştir. Çalışmada anket yöntemi kullanılmış ve teknoloji etkisi veya teknoloji kullanılmadan elde edilmeye çalışan bilgi erişim sürecinin farklı aşamalarında, öğrencilerin bilişsel süreçlerinin değiştiğini ve genellikle ISP modelindeki açıklamalarla tutarlı olduğu belirlenmiştir.…”
Section: Bi̇t Dijital Dönüşüm Ve Bilgi Arama Davranışıunclassified
“…Developing the research topic is a challenging task which involves many information activities with different sources at different places. Studies on students' topic exploration and development tended to focus on high school students (e.g., Cole et al, ; Kuhlthau, ), undergraduate students (e.g., Hulseberg & Twait, ; Wu et al, ), and doctoral students (e.g., Holliman & Jones, ; Isaac et al, 1989). Relatively few studies examined issues regarding topic development of master's students (e.g., Huang & Chen, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%