2021
DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2021.759624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Undergraduate Biology Students Received Higher Grades During COVID-19 but Perceived Negative Effects on Learning

Abstract: Institutions across the world transitioned abruptly to remote learning in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This rapid transition to remote learning has generally been predicted to negatively affect students, particularly those marginalized due to their race, socioeconomic class, or gender identity. In this study, we examined the impact of this transition in the Spring 2020 semester on the grades of students enrolled in the in-person biology program at a large university in Southwestern United States as compa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
19
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(98 reference statements)
3
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the same formula, the PEER population in our study is 51.5%. On the other hand, the student population studied by Supriya and colleagues was 49% white, 14% Asian, 5% Black, and 25% Hispanic ( 52 ), while our student population was 11% white, 38% Asian, 2% Black, and 43% Hispanic ( Table 2 ). It would be interesting to evaluate performance in STEM courses at those institutions for the fall 2020 and spring 2021 semesters.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using the same formula, the PEER population in our study is 51.5%. On the other hand, the student population studied by Supriya and colleagues was 49% white, 14% Asian, 5% Black, and 25% Hispanic ( 52 ), while our student population was 11% white, 38% Asian, 2% Black, and 43% Hispanic ( Table 2 ). It would be interesting to evaluate performance in STEM courses at those institutions for the fall 2020 and spring 2021 semesters.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…Two recent publications evaluated the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on student performance, finding that it increased in the spring 2020 academic term ( 52 , 53 ). Our spring 2020 data align with these findings, as the overall performance for this semester was not different from that of the IP spring 2019 and IP fall 2019 semesters ( Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we contribute to this scant literature and investigate how gender differences in university student progression evolved during the first wave of the pandemic. Compared to most extant work, which uses survey data with a relatively low number of respondents or with potential representativeness issues (e.g., Aucejo et al, 2020) or administrative data from single degrees or courses (e.g., Kofoed et al, 2021;Orlov et al, 2021;Supriya et al, 2021), we use administrative data on the whole student population of a large public university in Northern Italy, the University of Milan (UniMI hereafter).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, research regarding student grades during the pandemic demonstrated an increase in student grades. Supriya et al (2021) [21] conducted a study in the United States comparing a traditional online biology course to an in-class biology course that transitioned to on-line; grades were slightly higher for both compared to previous semesters. Karadag (2021) [22] noted a small amount of grade inflation during COVID-19 as compared to previous semesters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although students' grades were higher, students reported a negative impact on their learning, interactions with peers and instructors, feeling part of a campus community and career preparation. [21] Over half of faculty surveyed felt grades were not impacted. Further exploration of the effects of COVID-19 pandemic on student mental health and college experiences should be explored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%