1987
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Underestimation of Relative Weight by Use of Self-Reported Height and Weight

Abstract: Self-reported and measured height and weight were obtained from a representative sample of 1,598 persons in Auckland, New Zealand during 1982. The accuracy of the self-reported data and its effect on the misclassification of relative weight, as measured by Quetelet index, were examined. The finding that for most participants (75%), self-reported measures were no more than 3.5 cm from their measured height and 2.4 kg from their measured weight indicates that self-reports have a high degree of accuracy. However,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

10
187
3
16

Year Published

1992
1992
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 303 publications
(216 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
10
187
3
16
Order By: Relevance
“…The null association found in the current study may be due to the sample being drawn from socio-economically disadvantaged areas. Our reliance on self-reported height and weight to calculate BMI may also explain the lack of an association, as individuals are more likely to overestimate their height and underestimate their weight (73)(74)(75)(76) , resulting in a lower calculated BMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The null association found in the current study may be due to the sample being drawn from socio-economically disadvantaged areas. Our reliance on self-reported height and weight to calculate BMI may also explain the lack of an association, as individuals are more likely to overestimate their height and underestimate their weight (73)(74)(75)(76) , resulting in a lower calculated BMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Another possible mechanism by which calcium intake reduces BMI would be by increased fecal fat excretion, as recently suggested by Jacobsen et al 24 This study has several limitations: height and weight were self-reported, leading to a possible underestimation of overweight and obesity. 25,26 Still, reported height and weight data have been used in other epidemiological studies 27 and the bias is conservative, since overweight or obese subjects (misclassified as normal or overweight, respectively) would tend to decrease milk consumption in normal and overweight groups, thus decreasing the magnitude of the observed differences. Another limitation is the scant information regarding diet, which precluded a better assessment of calcium intake of the subjects; for instance, there was no information regarding the consumption of other dairy products such as yogurt and cheese, or other calcium-rich foodstuffs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among men in all age groups and among women in the age groups below 50, the Cohen's w is less than 0.10, indicating no effect, but the OR show strong differences in most of the age groups both among males and females, and it must be kept in mind that margins for the effect size are somewhat arbitrary. The use of two independent samples may have contributed to the findings, indicating that there might be a bias in the report of the SR-MD divergence when using one sample (Millar, 1986;Stewart et al, 1987;Nieto-Garcia et al, 1990;Rowland, 1990;Kuskowska-Wolk et al, 1992;Roberts, 1995;Niedhammer et al, 2000;Kuczmarski et al, 2001;Engstrom et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, large and consistent evidence shows that the BMI underestimates the proportions of overweight individuals among the general population when it is based on SR instead of MD data for body weight and height (Millar, 1986;Stewart et al, 1987;Nieto-Garcia et al, 1990;Rowland, 1990;Kuskowska-Wolk et al, 1992;Roberts, 1995;Niedhammer et al, 2000;Kuczmarski et al, 2001;Engstrom et al, 2003). The SR-MD divergence is larger among women than among men, the less educated the individuals are and the higher their BMI according to MD (Rowland, 1990;Niedhammer et al, 2000;Kuczmarski et al, 2001;Villanueva, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation