Abstract:Aquatic ecosystems are constantly changing due to natural and anthropogenic stressors. When dealing with such ‘moving targets’, one of the greatest challenges faced by scientists, managers and policy makers is to use appropriate time scales for environmental assessments. However, most aquatic systems lack monitoring data, and if a programme does exist, rarely have data been collected for more than a few years. Hence, it is often difficult or impossible to determine the nature and timing of ecosystem changes ba… Show more
“…Respondent groups include both obligate oxygenic photoautotrophs (in particular Chlorophyceae and Prymnesiophyceae) and mixotrophs (in particular Dinophyceae). Our combined DNA and pigment-based results obtained for 48 lakes are in line with several paleolimnological studies that have reported an increase in primary production throughout the Holocene 10,11 . The ratio and rates of autotrophic and heterotrophic production constitute the basis of the metabolic balance of lake ecosystems in the form of primary productivity and respiration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The second part of the twentieth century is unambiguously a time of major and multiple threats that might have disproportionately affected lake biodiversity and associated ecological functions (e.g., nutrient recycling, efficiency of trophic transfer, and quality of fish production) 3 , 8 . Paleolimnological studies have provided evidence supporting the occurrence of states of change in lake ecosystems, for instance the accelerated hypoxia in European lakes after 1900 9 or the increase in autochthonous primary production in lakes (e.g., Lake Superior 10 and see review by Smol 11 ). However, much less is known about the long-term changes of biodiversity.…”
Long-term time series have provided evidence that anthropogenic pressures can threaten lakes. Yet it remains unclear how and the extent to which lake biodiversity has changed during the Anthropocene, in particular for microbes. Here, we used DNA preserved in sediments to compare modern micro-eukaryotic communities with those from the end of the 19th century, i.e., before acceleration of the human imprint on ecosystems. Our results obtained for 48 lakes indicate drastic changes in the composition of microbial communities, coupled with a homogenization of their diversity between lakes. Remote high elevation lakes were globally less impacted than lowland lakes affected by local human activity. All functional groups (micro-algae, parasites, saprotrophs and consumers) underwent significant changes in diversity. However, we show that the effects of anthropogenic changes have benefited in particular phototrophic and mixotrophic species, which is consistent with the hypothesis of a global increase of primary productivity in lakes.
“…Respondent groups include both obligate oxygenic photoautotrophs (in particular Chlorophyceae and Prymnesiophyceae) and mixotrophs (in particular Dinophyceae). Our combined DNA and pigment-based results obtained for 48 lakes are in line with several paleolimnological studies that have reported an increase in primary production throughout the Holocene 10,11 . The ratio and rates of autotrophic and heterotrophic production constitute the basis of the metabolic balance of lake ecosystems in the form of primary productivity and respiration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The second part of the twentieth century is unambiguously a time of major and multiple threats that might have disproportionately affected lake biodiversity and associated ecological functions (e.g., nutrient recycling, efficiency of trophic transfer, and quality of fish production) 3 , 8 . Paleolimnological studies have provided evidence supporting the occurrence of states of change in lake ecosystems, for instance the accelerated hypoxia in European lakes after 1900 9 or the increase in autochthonous primary production in lakes (e.g., Lake Superior 10 and see review by Smol 11 ). However, much less is known about the long-term changes of biodiversity.…”
Long-term time series have provided evidence that anthropogenic pressures can threaten lakes. Yet it remains unclear how and the extent to which lake biodiversity has changed during the Anthropocene, in particular for microbes. Here, we used DNA preserved in sediments to compare modern micro-eukaryotic communities with those from the end of the 19th century, i.e., before acceleration of the human imprint on ecosystems. Our results obtained for 48 lakes indicate drastic changes in the composition of microbial communities, coupled with a homogenization of their diversity between lakes. Remote high elevation lakes were globally less impacted than lowland lakes affected by local human activity. All functional groups (micro-algae, parasites, saprotrophs and consumers) underwent significant changes in diversity. However, we show that the effects of anthropogenic changes have benefited in particular phototrophic and mixotrophic species, which is consistent with the hypothesis of a global increase of primary productivity in lakes.
“…Indeed, the majority of ecosystems worldwide, including freshwater ecosystems, are threatened by multiple anthropogenic stressors (Vörösmarty et al ., 2010; McCluney et al ., 2014; Albert et al ., 2020; Birk et al ., 2020). Lakes are no exception, as they are threatened, inter alia , by climate change, land‐use intensification, eutrophication, acidification, water abstraction, water‐level regulation, morphological alteration, and invasive species (Dudgeon et al ., 2006; Smol, 2019). Understanding the resilience and recovery of lakes to environmental change has thus emerged as an important research program from the perspectives of biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services (Angeler & Drakare, 2013; Angeler et al ., 2015).…”
The Anthropocene presents formidable threats to freshwater ecosystems. Lakes are especially vulnerable and important at the same time. They cover only a small area worldwide but harbour high levels of biodiversity and contribute disproportionately to ecosystem services. Lakes differ with respect to their general type (e.g. land‐locked, drainage, floodplain and large lakes) and position in the landscape (e.g. highland versus lowland lakes), which contribute to the dynamics of these systems. Lakes should be generally viewed as ‘meta‐systems’, whereby biodiversity is strongly affected by species dispersal, and ecosystem dynamics are contributed by the flow of matter and substances among locations in a broader waterscape context. Lake connectivity in the waterscape and position in the landscape determine the degree to which a lake is prone to invasion by non‐native species and accumulation of harmful substances. Highly connected lakes low in the landscape accumulate nutrients and pollutants originating from ecosystems higher in the landscape. The monitoring and restoration of lake biodiversity and ecosystem services should consider the fact that a high degree of dynamism is present at local, regional and global scales. However, local and regional monitoring may be plagued by the unpredictability of ecological phenomena, hindering adaptive management of lakes. Although monitoring data are increasingly becoming available to study responses of lakes to global change, we still lack suitable integration of models for entire waterscapes. Research across disciplinary boundaries is needed to address the challenges that lakes face in the Anthropocene because they may play an increasingly important role in harbouring unique aquatic biota as well as providing ecosystem goods and services in the future.
“…Anthropogenic activities such as changes in land-use can induce major transformations in lake systems via increased catchment erosion, and its effect on sedimentation rates and nutrient loads leading to eutrophication and ecological shifts affecting lake biota [1][2][3][4][5]. Tracing such environmental dynamics over short timescales and assessing the type and timing of the main drivers of change are needed for a better understanding of the complex cause-effect relationship between environmental responses, anthropogenic activities and natural climate variability, and therefore to improve management strategies [6][7][8].…”
Recent decades have been marked by unprecendented environmental changes which threaten the integrity of freshwater systems and their ecological value. Although most of these changes can be attributed to human activities, disentagling natural and anthropogenic drivers remains a challenge. In this study, surface sediments from Lake Ighiel, a mid-altitude site in the Carpathian Mts (Romania) were investigated following high-resolution sedimentological, geochemical, environmental magnetic and diatom analyses supported by historical cartographic and documentary evidence. Our results suggest that between 1920 and 1960 the study area experienced no significant anthropogenic impact. An excellent correspondence is observed between lake proxy responses (e.g., growth of submerged macrophytes, high detrital input, shifts in diatom assemblages) and parameters tracking natural hydroclimate variability (e.g., temperature, NAO). This highlights a dominant natural hydroclimatic control on the lacustrine system. From 1960 however, the depositional regime shifted markedly from laminated to homogenous clays; since then geochemical and magnetic data document a trend of significant (and ongoing) subsurface erosion across the catchment. This is paralleled by a shift in lake ecosystem conditions denoting a strong response to an intensified anthropogenic impact, mainly through forestry. An increase in detrital input and marked changes in the diatom community are observed over the last three decades, alongside accelerated sedimentation rates following enhanced grazing and deforestation in the
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.