2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncovering Treatment Burden as a Key Concept for Stroke Care: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research

Abstract: In a systematic review of qualitative research, Katie Gallacher and colleagues examine the evidence related to treatment burden after stroke from the patient perspective. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

9
233
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(254 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
(647 reference statements)
9
233
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical relevance of treatment burden has been established for consequential outcomes such as adherence to prescribed treatments, quality of life, and health services utilization. 13,22,[36][37][38] That aspects of burden associated with managing health was more commonly experienced by persons in worse health underscores the practical importance of incorporating individual perspectives and preferences in prioritization of possible treatment and preventive regimens by balancing evidence of clinical benefit with minimizing burdens. [39][40][41] Current delivery and reimbursement structures fail to support providers' ability to comprehensively deliberate with patients about the risks and benefits of alternative treatment options and preventive strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The clinical relevance of treatment burden has been established for consequential outcomes such as adherence to prescribed treatments, quality of life, and health services utilization. 13,22,[36][37][38] That aspects of burden associated with managing health was more commonly experienced by persons in worse health underscores the practical importance of incorporating individual perspectives and preferences in prioritization of possible treatment and preventive regimens by balancing evidence of clinical benefit with minimizing burdens. [39][40][41] Current delivery and reimbursement structures fail to support providers' ability to comprehensively deliberate with patients about the risks and benefits of alternative treatment options and preventive strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Questions to assess health care decision-making preferences and treatment burden were developed based on existing literature, and were devised for broad population relevance and feasible administration within a national survey. This emphasis varies from the prevailing evidence base that has focused on decision-making preferences and experiences of care with a specific health condition, 13,22,38 clinical situation, 36,37 or medical encounter, 14,28 although measures to ascertain these constructs are evolving. 2,49,50 Study findings are limited to older adults' perspectives, and do not encompass perspectives of family members and close friends who may share or assume responsibility for management of health care activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Patients perceive nursing staff as only focusing on meeting patients’ basic physical needs, which gives patients a feeling of physiological and emotional isolation during their inpatient rehabilitation (Gallacher et al, 2013; Hole et al, 2014; Satink et al, 2013; Secrest & Thomas, 1999). Patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation are described as being inactive and alone during the day (Bernhardt, Dewey, Thrift, & Donnan, 2004; West & Bernhardt, 2012) despite evidence that early rehabilitation and intensive training are significant for functional outcome (Askim, Bernhardt, Salvesen, & Indredavik, 2014; Bernhardt, Godecke, Johnson, & Langhorne, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%