An
intriguing redox chemistry via oxygen has emerged to achieve
high-energy-density cathodes and has been intensively studied for
practical use of anion-utilization oxides in A-ion batteries (A: Li
or Na). However, in general, the oxygen redox disappears in the subsequent
discharge with a large voltage hysteresis after the first charge process
for A-excess layered oxides exhibiting anion redox. Unlike these hysteretic
oxygen redox cathodes, the two Na-excess oxide models Na2IrO3 and Na2RuO3 unambiguously exhibit
nonhysteretic oxygen capacities during the first cycle, with honeycomb-ordered
superstructures. In this regard, the reaction mechanism in the two
cathode models is elucidated to determine the origin of nonhysteretic
oxygen capacities using first-principles calculations. First, the
vacancy formation energies show that the thermodynamic instability
in Na2IrO3 increases at a lower rate than that
in Na2RuO3 upon charging. Second, considering
that the strains of Ir–O and Ru–O bonding lengths are
softened after the single-cation redox of Ru4+/Ru5+ and Ir4+/Ir5+, the contribution in the oxygen
redox from x = 0.5 to 0.75 is larger in Na1–x
Ru0.5O1.5 than that in Na1–x
Ir0.5O1.5.
Third, the charge variations indicate a dominant cation redox activity
via Ir(5d)–O(2p) for x above 0.5 in Na1–x
Ir0.5O1.5.
Its redox participation occurred with the oxygen redox, opposite to
the behavior in Na1–x
Ru0.5O1.5. These three considerations imply that the chemical
weakness of Ir(5d)–O(2p) leads to a more redox-active environment
of Ir ions and reduces the oxygen redox activity, which triggers the
nonhysteretic oxygen capacity during (de)intercalation. This provides
a comprehensive guideline for design of reversible oxygen redox capacities
in oxide cathodes for advanced A-ion batteries.