Uncertainty of Historical Measurements of 131I in Hanford-Area Vegetation

Abstract

The Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction (HEDR) Project was conducted to estimate the radiation dose that individuals could have received as a result of emissions to the air and water from Hanford Site operations since 1944. The largest doses were to the human thyroid gland from 131I released into the atmosphere from Hanford facilities in the 1945-1947 time period. In support of the dose reconstruction effort, a database of historical environmental radioactivity measurements was constructed. This database includes measurements of total radioactivity for vegetation samples collected from 1945-1948 and counted using a Geiger-Mueller (GM) detector system. Because the factors used at that time to convert the GM counts to 131I activity did not take all parameters into account, and because some parameter values were inaccurate, more accurate conversion factors were developed as part of the HEDR Project. These factors can be used to estimate the actual historical activity levels. This paper summarizes the Monte Carlo uncertainty and sensitivity analysis methods used to assess the uncertainty of the newly reconstructed historical vegetation 131I activities and to identify the parameters that contributed the most uncertainty to these reconstructed activities. Based on the study of two vegetation (sagebrush) samples collected in the mid-1940's, it appears that the true 131I activity of the historical vegetation samples should be within a factor of three of the reconstructed activity. Also, the uncertainty in the parameter Icf (the fraction of the background-corrected GM measurement of a vegetation sample that resulted from 131I) was found to contribute the most uncertainty to the reconstructed 131I activities when the uncertainty in Icf was large.

Uncertainties in estimating health risks associated with exposure to ionising radiation

“…Quantitative uncertainty analysis is a well-accepted methodology developed in a decisiontheoretic framework that has been extensively applied to nuclear reactor safety and other issues (Gilbert et al 1996, IAEA 1989, NRC 1975, 2012a, 2012b, Warren-Hicks and Moore 1998. Quantitative uncertainty analysis involves the application of Bayesian probability methods to estimates of risk of an adverse outcome that are based on uncertain statistical and subjective information.…”

Extension of sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for long term dose assessment of high level nuclear waste disposal sites to uncertainties in the human behaviour

“…The Monte Carlo method (Metropolis, 1987), which relies essentially on the repeated sampling of input parameter values and repeated computational runs of a model code, has been extensively used in all fields spanning natural to social sciences and beyond (Doucet et al, 2001;Hora, 1997). In the environmental field, it has been applied to test the explanatory value of the model for contaminated sites (Gilbert et al, 1996) as well as a risk analysis tool (Eged et al, 2006;Gilbert et al, 1995;Wolt et al, 2001). For long-term risks, associated with high-level radioactive waste disposal, applications have also been widespread (Andersson et al, 2005;Avila et al, 2006;Bergströ m and Nordlinder, 1991;Ikonen, 2006;Jones et al, 2004;Schwarz and Hoffman, 1980).…”

Low-Dose Extrapolation of Radiation Health Risks: Some Implications of Uncertainty for Radiation Protection at Low Doses

“…The term "quantitative uncertainty analysis" (QUA) refers to a well-accepted methodology developed in a decision-theoretic framework that has been extensively applied to nuclear reactor safety (U.S. NRC 1990(U.S. NRC , 1995 and ecological risk assessment (Gilbert et al 1996;IAEA 1989;Warren-Hicks and Moore 1998). QUA involves the application of Bayesian probability methods to estimates and decision rules based on uncertain statistical and subjective information.…”