2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.02.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty of downscaling method in quantifying the impact of climate change on hydrology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
334
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 587 publications
(348 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
7
334
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though our evaluation illustrated two simple regression-type statistical downscaling models, the main conclusions may also be valid for more complicated models, like the nonlinear classification and regression models used by Gaitan et al (2014b) to downscale daily precipitation. Our results also corroborate the cautionary notes from Chen et al (2011) and Ouyang et al (2014) regarding the confidence that should be attributed to climate change impact studies based on only one downscaling method.…”
Section: Summary and Recommendationssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Even though our evaluation illustrated two simple regression-type statistical downscaling models, the main conclusions may also be valid for more complicated models, like the nonlinear classification and regression models used by Gaitan et al (2014b) to downscale daily precipitation. Our results also corroborate the cautionary notes from Chen et al (2011) and Ouyang et al (2014) regarding the confidence that should be attributed to climate change impact studies based on only one downscaling method.…”
Section: Summary and Recommendationssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…For example, when comparing 28 climate change projections from seven GCMs and three scenarios, over Central Quebec, Chen et al (2011) concluded that the uncertainty envelopes from the downscaling methods were similar to the envelopes from the emission scenarios. Therefore, it is possible that if we add the (unaccounted) non-stationarity uncertainty to the downscaling uncertainty, this envelope could become the predominant one, as the regression-based statistical downscaling methods employed by Chen et al (2011) contributed significantly to the uncertainty envelope.…”
Section: Summary and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…dynamical) downscaling procedures. However, Chen et al (2011) claimed that there are many sources of uncertainty involved in climate change studies and the major sources of uncertainty are linked to GCM and greenhouse gasses emissions scenarios (GGES) in addition to the uncertainties that stem from a downscaling method. Therefore, to avoid the GCM and downscaling uncertainties and challenges, many studies (e.g., Tigkas et al 2012;Vangelis et al 2013;Reis et al 2016) proposed delta perturbation (change factor) concepts, in which plausible alterations in meteorological variables are assumed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainty of the climate impact studies can be attributed in the first place to the climate models and the emission scenarios. Recent studies (Chen et al, 2011;Stoll et al, 2011;Crosbie et al, 2011) showed that apart from the uncertainty of the climate models also the downscaling process contributes significantly to the uncertainty of the results of impact studies. The fraction of uncertainty related to the hydrological part Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%