2003
DOI: 10.1063/1.1627198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty Budgets for Realization of ITS-90 by Radiation Thermometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When the CCT K5 Final Report is available, the review protocol will be updated accordingly. An additional scrutiny criterion is the existence of an uncertainty budget with evidence that the budget follows Table C of [7] for t > 960 • C. The CCT WG8 accepted this CMC review protocol in December 2003.…”
Section: Radiation Thermometer Cmc Review Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the CCT K5 Final Report is available, the review protocol will be updated accordingly. An additional scrutiny criterion is the existence of an uncertainty budget with evidence that the budget follows Table C of [7] for t > 960 • C. The CCT WG8 accepted this CMC review protocol in December 2003.…”
Section: Radiation Thermometer Cmc Review Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The review protocol provides three-tier cutoff values for determining whether no review, an RMO-level review, or a CCT WG8-level review is necessary. The cutoff values were determined from the arithmetic mean of the normal and best uncertainty (k = 2) values from CCT WG5, a published document for Service Category 2.5.4, and the TRIRAT comparison uncertainty (k = 2) values [7][8][9]. The review protocol does not use CCT K5 comparison values due to the fact that the CCT K5 NMI uncertainty values were not available at the time of the review protocol creation.…”
Section: Radiation Thermometer Cmc Review Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temperature measurements of the LgAu1 and SmAu cells were also performed in 1991 where the differences in temperature were 32 mK (k = 2) (Charles Gibson, Personal communication). These measurements can also be examined with respect to the uncertainty budget of fixed-point measurements listed by the CCT-WG5 for ITS-90 fixed points [6]. The items in the uncertainty budget are grouped according to those associated with the fixed-point transition and those associated with the operation of the radiation thermometer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously [or "traditionally"], Eq. 1 has been used to estimate the temperature drop in uncertainty calculations [7], and this contribution may need to be revised to lower values to take into account the influence of the surroundings. From these calculations estimates of the correction for the temperature drop for this design of an HTFP blackbody can be made.…”
Section: Furnace Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%