2017
DOI: 10.1039/c6an01342b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty budgeting in fold change determination and implications for non-targeted metabolomics studies in model systems

Abstract: The p-value is the most prominent established metric for statistical significance in non-targeted metabolomics. However, its adequacy has repeatedly been the subject of discussion criticizing its uncertainty and its dependence on sample size and statistical power. These issues compromise non-targeted metabolomics in model systems, where studies typically investigate 5-10 samples per group. In this paper we propose a different approach for assessing the relevance of fold change (FC) data, where the FC is treate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compounds in P‐stress treatments were assessed by relative changes in abundance as response ratios, in comparison to a control condition. Twofold change and larger with t test probability limits of p < .05 between P stress and control were considered reliable and significant (Ortmayr, Charwat, Kasper, Hann, & Koellensperger, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compounds in P‐stress treatments were assessed by relative changes in abundance as response ratios, in comparison to a control condition. Twofold change and larger with t test probability limits of p < .05 between P stress and control were considered reliable and significant (Ortmayr, Charwat, Kasper, Hann, & Koellensperger, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general biological variability is commonly estimated as approximately 15% [ 31 ], and hence has a major influence on uncertainty. Since the cell is highly complex in terms of its metabolism, controlling the metabolic state during the experiment is vital.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used R 2 to evaluate the fit of the model, Q 2 to assess the predictability of the model, and FC to show the importance of each metabolite. FC is a quantitative measure for changes in metabolite concentrations relative to a reference group 41 . A larger absolute value of FC indicates a more significant difference in the average peak area (metabolite intensity) between lung cancer patients and patients with nonmalignant disease as controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%