Uncertainty assessment of hydrologic and climate forecast models in Northeastern Brazil

Abstract

Abstract:Seasonal streamflow forecasts based on climate information can guide water managers toward superior reservoir operations, leading to improved water resources management efficiency. Uncertainty, however, is always present in seasonal streamflow forecasts, affecting the forecast value. Thus, a forecast should not be considered complete without a description of its uncertainty, which is critical for climate risk and water resources management. This study investigates the uncertainties of a seasonal streamflow forecast system for Northeastern Brazil based on climate precipitation forecasts and hydrologic modeling. These two sources of uncertainty are treated independently and then compared in order to guide future investments in the forecast system. Sea surface temperature is considered to be the primary source of uncertainty for the seasonal precipitation forecasts, based upon a 10-member climate model ensemble. Parameter uncertainty is considered to be the only source of uncertainty for the hydrologic model. Estimation of parameter uncertainty is estimated by the Shuffled Complex Evolution Metropolis algorithm, which employs a Markov Chain Monte Carlo scheme to provide the posterior distribution of the parameters and form uncertainty bounds on streamflow forecasts. Results indicate that uncertainties associated with the climate forecast are much larger than those from parameter estimation in the hydrologic model. Although model structure has not been considered in the evaluation of hydrologic uncertainties, this study indicates that future efforts to address the predominant source of uncertainty should focus on the climate prediction models.

Quantifying hydrological responses of small Mediterranean catchments under climate change projections

“…Indeed, the assessment of these uncertainties is difficult due to their complex interaction and propagation throughout the modeling chain (Ludwig et al, 2011;Oni et al, 2014;Refsgaard et al, 2014). Several studies (Arnell, 2011;Teng et al, 2011;Kwon et al, 2012) acknowledged that CM projections are the main source of uncertainty in climatic change impacts assessment. Others (Bastola et al, 2008;Velázquez et al, 2013;Sellami et al, 2015) demonstrated that hydrological model uncertainty, mainly parametric uncertainty, is far to be neglected in climatic change impact studies.…”

Predictability of Western Himalayan river flow: melt seasonal inflow into Bhakra Reservoir in northern India

“…Flood volume predictions are also needed to complete such an analysis, and to date very few efforts have been made at long lead flood volume forecasting. Nonlinear or nonparametric methods are often used to address such problems effectively (Kwon et al, 2012). However, given the short record available here with potential data quality issues, these methods were contra-indicated based on our initial exploratory analyses.…”

Crise de abastecimento de água em São Paulo e falta de planejamento estratégico

“…Na região Nordeste ocorre o oposto da região Sul, com o El Niño sendo associado a uma tendência de estiagem e o La Niña, a períodos de maior pluviosidade (Kwon et al, 2012). A influência do fenômeno também é verificada em Minas Gerais (Mello et al, 2008), na disponibilidade hídrica do Rio Grande do Sul (Teixeira;Satyamurty, 2011;Silva, 2010) (Arumí et al, 2013;Meza, 2013), Taiwan (Tsai;Elsberry, 2013), sul da China (Zhang et al, 2013) e Califórnia (Gelcer et al, 2013).…”