The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
RAMS '06. Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2006.
DOI: 10.1109/rams.2006.1677378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty assessment for availability: importance measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their technique is comparable to Birnbaum significance and they well defined the measures like failure and repair rate based on the system availability. Miman and Pohl (2006) presented a technology called RBD which measures the availability of the component. These works are similar like Cassady et al's (2004) and they considered availability models as two or more states.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their technique is comparable to Birnbaum significance and they well defined the measures like failure and repair rate based on the system availability. Miman and Pohl (2006) presented a technology called RBD which measures the availability of the component. These works are similar like Cassady et al's (2004) and they considered availability models as two or more states.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many CIMs have been developed to determine the criticality of individual components to system performance. 17 Primarily, importance measures have been introduced to measure the influence of particular components on the overall reliability of the system. 18,19 Specific CIMs include risk reduction worth (RRW), an index that quantifies the potential damage to a system caused by a particular component failure, and the reliability achievement worth (RAW) of a component, or the maximum proportion increase in system reliability generated by that component.…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the large amount of public funds spent on complex assets such as weapons systems, very little research incorporates measures of either cost risk, or readiness risk. Exceptions to this include the work of Miman and Pohl (2006) who examined alternatives for reduction of cost risk, and who examined readiness risk in a post hoc analysis. To our knowledge, no research has examined bi-criteria minimization of Ao and LCC risk, though there is research on the bi-criteria minimization of other types of risk.…”
Section: Silos and Risk In The Public Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%