2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11433-012-4727-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty and universality in the power-law singularity as a precursor of catastrophic rupture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we have λ ≥ 2 (see Figure b). The result of λ = 2 (namely, βF=1λ1=12) can be derived in terms of series expansion (Jin et al, ). In series expansion, the first term of the series equals to zero due to energy criterion and the other order terms higher than the second one are omitted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we have λ ≥ 2 (see Figure b). The result of λ = 2 (namely, βF=1λ1=12) can be derived in terms of series expansion (Jin et al, ). In series expansion, the first term of the series equals to zero due to energy criterion and the other order terms higher than the second one are omitted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the applied load P of cracking tests was selected as the controlling variable. Assuming that the controlling variable is continuous and derivable with the response variable, the applied load P can be expressed as the function of the damage factor D, that is, P(D), which can be given by the Taylor expansion (Jin et al, 2012;Liang et al, 2016):…”
Section: Damage Model For Catastrophic Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the applied load P of cracking tests was selected as the controlling variable. Assuming that the controlling variable is continuous and derivable with the response variable, the applied load P can be expressed as the function of the damage factor D , that is, P ( D ), which can be given by the Taylor expansion (Jin et al., 2012; Liang et al., 2016): P(D)=Pf+dPdDDf()DfD+12d2Pd2DDfDfD2+scriptODfD2 $P(D)={P}_{f}+{\left(\frac{dP}{dD}\right)}_{{D}_{f}}\left({D}_{f}-D\right)+\frac{1}{2}{\left(\frac{{d}^{2}P}{{d}^{2}D}\right)}_{{D}_{f}}{\left({D}_{f}-D\right)}^{2}+\mathcal{O}{\left({D}_{f}-D\right)}^{2}$ where P f is the failure load, which equals the maximum load P max of the cracking test. It is worth noting that the terms with order higher than two were omitted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially when b F ¼ À1 (i.e., ¼ 2), the rupture time can be determined by extrapolating the inverse rate R À1 to the abscissa (Boue´et al, 2015;Voight, 1988). However, the power-law singularity exponent b F is not always a constant in reported measurements but exhibits a large dispersion (Boue´et al, 2015;Cornelius and Scott, 1993;Hao et al, 2017;Jin et al, 2012;Kilburn, 2003;Voight and Cornelius, 1991;Xue et al, 2018). The uncertainty resulting from the scatter of the exponent makes it difficult to use such methods for prediction of the rupture time (Boue´et al, 2015;Hao et al, 2017;Xue et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%