2018
DOI: 10.1002/2018jb015591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Changeable Power Law Singularity and its Application to Prediction of Catastrophic Rupture in Uniaxial Compressive Tests of Geomedia

Abstract: The acceleration precursor of catastrophic rupture in rock‐like materials is usually characterized by a power law relationship, but the exponent exhibits a considerable scatter in practice. In this paper, based on experiments of granites and marbles under quasi‐static uniaxial and unconfined compression, it is shown that the power law exponent varies between −1 and −1/2. Such a changeable power law singularity can be justified by the energy criterion and a power function approximation. As the power law exponen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dot represents the first and second derivatives of the response quantity X with respect to time. The validation of predicting rupture time based on equations (2) and (3) has been widely verified in many retrospective predictions (Boue´et al, 2015;Hao et al, 2016;Smith and Kilburn, 2010;Voight and Cornelius, 1991;Xue et al, 2018) of laboratory experiments (Hao et al, 2013;Kilburn, 2012), landslides (Helmstetter et al, 2004), earthquakes (Ben-Zion and Lyakhovsky, 2002;Sornette and Sammis, 1995), and volcanic eruptions (Kilburn, 2003;Main, 1999). Especially when b F ¼ À1 (i.e., ¼ 2), the rupture time can be determined by extrapolating the inverse rate R À1 to the abscissa (Boue´et al, 2015;Voight, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The dot represents the first and second derivatives of the response quantity X with respect to time. The validation of predicting rupture time based on equations (2) and (3) has been widely verified in many retrospective predictions (Boue´et al, 2015;Hao et al, 2016;Smith and Kilburn, 2010;Voight and Cornelius, 1991;Xue et al, 2018) of laboratory experiments (Hao et al, 2013;Kilburn, 2012), landslides (Helmstetter et al, 2004), earthquakes (Ben-Zion and Lyakhovsky, 2002;Sornette and Sammis, 1995), and volcanic eruptions (Kilburn, 2003;Main, 1999). Especially when b F ¼ À1 (i.e., ¼ 2), the rupture time can be determined by extrapolating the inverse rate R À1 to the abscissa (Boue´et al, 2015;Voight, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It is a self-sustaining process that does not need any supplying of external work. In order to characterize the catastrophic rupture, Hao et al (2013) and Xue et al (2018) introduced a response function…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As illustrated in Figure 1 (see details in section 2), an evident acceleration in cumulative AE events is typically registered in the vicinity of catastrophic rupture, which is quite similar to “accelerating creep” phenomenon (Amitrano et al, 2005; Heap et al, 2009; Koivisto et al, 2016; Lennartz‐Sassinek et al, 2014; Nechad et al, 2005b; Pál et al, 2016; Voight, 1988, 1989; Vu et al, 2019). The acceleration behavior has been analyzed as a critical phenomenon with a power‐law divergence of geophysical precursors at failure (Abaimov & Cusumano, 2014; Bak & Tang, 1989; Ben‐Zion & Lyakhovsky, 2002; Renard et al, 2018; Rundle et al, 2003; Toussaint & Pride, 2002; Xue et al, 2018). Such physical process underlies the failure forecast (Poli, 2017; Xue et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acceleration behavior has been analyzed as a critical phenomenon with a power‐law divergence of geophysical precursors at failure (Abaimov & Cusumano, 2014; Bak & Tang, 1989; Ben‐Zion & Lyakhovsky, 2002; Renard et al, 2018; Rundle et al, 2003; Toussaint & Pride, 2002; Xue et al, 2018). Such physical process underlies the failure forecast (Poli, 2017; Xue et al, 2018). To quantitatively describe the acceleration process toward failure, an empirical relation (Voight's relation) between a response quantity Ω (e.g., strain and AE) and its rate was established as follows (Voight, 1988, 1989): trueΩ¨Ω̇α=A where α is an exponent measuring the degree of nonlinearity and A is a constant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%