2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty analysis of radar rainfall estimates induced by atmospheric conditions using long short-term memory networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rain gauges, radar and satellite observations are the three main sources of data characterizing rainfall. These three sources of data have advantages and disadvantages in terms of spatial and temporal resolution, observation accuracy and coverage [94]. Satellite and radar data can be less accurate than rain gauges, which measure rainfall directly.…”
Section: Issues Related To Flood Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rain gauges, radar and satellite observations are the three main sources of data characterizing rainfall. These three sources of data have advantages and disadvantages in terms of spatial and temporal resolution, observation accuracy and coverage [94]. Satellite and radar data can be less accurate than rain gauges, which measure rainfall directly.…”
Section: Issues Related To Flood Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dai and Han (Dai and Han, 2014) were the first to incorporate the wind field into the construction of a radar rainfall uncertainty model, and the proposed model improved the correlation coefficients of most rainfall events by over 10%. Yang et al (2020) considered multiple atmospheric fields to build a radar rainfall uncertainty adjustment model, and the results indicated a satisfactory performance of the model under high relative humidity and wind speed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most correction schemes rely on the use of 4D wind profiles derived from numerical prediction models (Mittermaier et al, 2004;Lack and Fox, 2007;Lauri et al, 2012;Sandford, 2015) or a combination of them with reanalysis (Dai et al, 2013(Dai et al, , 2019Yang et al, 2020). The latter also accounts for drop size distribution (DSD).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%