2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty analysis of impact indicators for the integrity of combined caprock during CO2 geosequestration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, CO 2 injection changes the pore pressure and consequently the stress state within the coal seam, which results in mechanical deformations in the reservoir and consequently the rock mass above. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Studies have used powerful reservoir simulators, or mechanical analysis tools, or their combinations, such as FLAC-TOUGH, 17 FLAC-SIMED, 14 and ABAQUS-ECLIPSE. 7 Th e injection-induced mechanical deformations can change the aperture of the fractures and hence the permeability of the coal seam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, CO 2 injection changes the pore pressure and consequently the stress state within the coal seam, which results in mechanical deformations in the reservoir and consequently the rock mass above. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Studies have used powerful reservoir simulators, or mechanical analysis tools, or their combinations, such as FLAC-TOUGH, 17 FLAC-SIMED, 14 and ABAQUS-ECLIPSE. 7 Th e injection-induced mechanical deformations can change the aperture of the fractures and hence the permeability of the coal seam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11] Th e need for coupled modeling of geological sequestration of CO 2 has been addressed and investigated in many studies. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Studies have used powerful reservoir simulators, or mechanical analysis tools, or their combinations, such as FLAC-TOUGH, 17 FLAC-SIMED, 14 and ABAQUS-ECLIPSE. 21 While some of these studies have considered coalbed sequestration, they use mainly conventional dual porosity models implemented in commercial reservoir simulators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the mechanisms of how elevating the pore pressure can bring the fault to slippage illustrated by (Ellsworth, 2013), a fault remains locked as long as the applied shear stress is less than the strength of the contact. During the stimulation injection, the shear stress evolves simultaneously with tensile failure; the activation of the fault is usually initiated by the increase in the shear stress and the decrease in the normal stress that can bring the fault to failure and trigger the nucleation of microseismic events (Wei et al, 2015(Wei et al, , 2016. The variations in the contact stress and shear stress along the fault plane at the ends of the "Pump" stage (green line), the "Hold" stage (blue line) and the "Extraction" stage (black line) are shown in Figure 7.…”
Section: Fault Slippage and Induced Microseismicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e massive fluid injected into underground formations can often induce fault reactivation and slip. Several studies have explored this effect, and several different mechanisms have been proposed to explain it [17][18][19][20][21]. e pore-pressure increase is considered to be the main mechanism to explain the occurrence of induced seismicity in underground fluidinjection projects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%