2015
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/52/3/s156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainties in internal gas counting

Abstract: The uncertainties in internal gas counting will be broken down into counting uncertainties and gas handling uncertainties. Counting statistics, spectrum analysis, and electronic uncertainties will be discussed with respect to the actual counting of the activity. The effects of the gas handling and quantities of counting and sample gases on the uncertainty in the determination of the activity will be included when describing the uncertainties arising in the sample preparation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurement techniques employed are as follows: ionisation current measurements in a re-entrant ionisation chamber (IC) or a hospital calibrator (HIC) [31,32], net area analysis of full-energy γ-ray peaks (and integral spectrum counting) by γ-ray spectrometry with a HPGe detector (HPGe) [33], particle counting in a planar silicon detector in quasi-2πconfiguration (PIPS) [34], X-ray counting at a small defined solid angle with a gas-filled proportional counter (PC) [35,36], live-timed β–γ anti-coincidence counting (LTAC) [37], triple-to-double coincidence counting with a liquid scintillation vial and three photodetectors (TDCR) [38], liquid scintillation counting (LSC) [38], particle and photon counting in a sandwich CsI (Tl) spectrometer (CsI) [39], internal gas counting (IGC) [40], and α-particle counting at a small defined solid angle with a large planar silicon detector (αDSA) [35,36]. An overview of standardisation techniques and their sources of error can be found in the special issues 44(4) and 52(3) of Metrologia [41,42] and references in [25,28].…”
Section: Measurements and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement techniques employed are as follows: ionisation current measurements in a re-entrant ionisation chamber (IC) or a hospital calibrator (HIC) [31,32], net area analysis of full-energy γ-ray peaks (and integral spectrum counting) by γ-ray spectrometry with a HPGe detector (HPGe) [33], particle counting in a planar silicon detector in quasi-2πconfiguration (PIPS) [34], X-ray counting at a small defined solid angle with a gas-filled proportional counter (PC) [35,36], live-timed β–γ anti-coincidence counting (LTAC) [37], triple-to-double coincidence counting with a liquid scintillation vial and three photodetectors (TDCR) [38], liquid scintillation counting (LSC) [38], particle and photon counting in a sandwich CsI (Tl) spectrometer (CsI) [39], internal gas counting (IGC) [40], and α-particle counting at a small defined solid angle with a large planar silicon detector (αDSA) [35,36]. An overview of standardisation techniques and their sources of error can be found in the special issues 44(4) and 52(3) of Metrologia [41,42] and references in [25,28].…”
Section: Measurements and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the low energy of the emitted beta particle and the absence of subsequent gamma-ray emission in the decay of 3 H, not many techniques are suitable for absolute activity measurements of this nuclide. Internal gas proportional counting [34] is a method applied at the NIST for the standardisation of 3 H in gas. The radioactive gas is mixed with counter gas and measured in a set of proportional counters of different length.…”
Section: H @Nistmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lucas [1] previously summarized the sixteen different tritiated-water standards disseminated by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), formerly the National Bureau of Standards (NBS), from 1954 to 1999. The most recent of these were standardized by length-compensated internal gas proportional counting [2][3][4]. 3 The procedure for the preparation of tritiated-water standards and the internal proportional gas counting method used at NIST has been described by Unterweger et al [7] and Unterweger and Lucas [8].…”
Section: Historical Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Zimmerman and Collé [11] in 1996 made a direct comparison between the then extant French and U.S. national standards for tritiated-water that were used as efficiency tracing monitors in liquid scintillation. The French standard from Laboratoire Primaire des Rayonnements Ionisants (LPRI), now known as Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel (LNHB), was certified with a reference date of 27 January 1994 [12]; whereas the US standard was a Standard Reference Material (SRM) 4 , 4927E, certified with reference date of 15 August 1995 [13]. The ratio of the massic activities for the two standards relative to the ratio of their certified values, as obtained from seven experimental trials of comparative LS measurements with quench matching under a wide variety of counting conditions, was 0.9963  0.0014, where the cited uncertainty is the standard deviation of the mean on the ratio.…”
Section: Historical Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation