2018
DOI: 10.1051/epjn/2018005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainties for Swiss LWR spent nuclear fuels due to nuclear data

Abstract: Abstract. This paper presents a study of the impact of the nuclear data (cross sections, neutron emission and spectra) on different quantities for spent nuclear fuels (SNF) from Swiss power plants: activities, decay heat, neutron and gamma sources and isotopic vectors. Realistic irradiation histories are considered using validated core follow-up models based on CASMO and SIMULATE. Two Pressurized and one Boiling Water Reactors (PWR and BWR) are considered over a large number of operated cycles. All the assembl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In another work considering cross sections and fission yields [5], the maximum burnup uncertainty is about 2.4% at 15 GWd/tU, maximum decay heat uncertainty is 7% at 2 -4 years of cooling, maximum uncertainty in activity is ~6% at 50 -100 years of cooling, maximum uncertainty in neutron source is 18% at 1,000 -5,000 years of cooling, and maximum uncertainty in gamma source is ~9% at 2 -4 years of cooling.…”
Section: Figure 1 Uncertainties Of Source Terms and Nuclides Due To Modeling Parametersmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In another work considering cross sections and fission yields [5], the maximum burnup uncertainty is about 2.4% at 15 GWd/tU, maximum decay heat uncertainty is 7% at 2 -4 years of cooling, maximum uncertainty in activity is ~6% at 50 -100 years of cooling, maximum uncertainty in neutron source is 18% at 1,000 -5,000 years of cooling, and maximum uncertainty in gamma source is ~9% at 2 -4 years of cooling.…”
Section: Figure 1 Uncertainties Of Source Terms and Nuclides Due To Modeling Parametersmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Until now, most of the works carried out have been based on the propagation of nuclear data uncertainties on uncertainty in SNF characteristics [4][5]. Little attention has been paid to uncertainties in SNF due to uncertainties in modelling parameters [6][7] and this will be the focus of this study as it relates to pressurized water reactor (PWR) spent nuclear fuel (SNF) source terms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the present analysis, the irradiation history for this assembly is not extracted from the ARIANE report, but directly from the PSI database called CMSYS. Such database is normally used for core licensing calculations for the Swiss regulator, and contains all detailed information regarding reactor cycle operations and conditions, necessary for CASMO5 and SIMULATE simulations; interested readers can find more information in references [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Generally, the PSI database contains a more detailed irradiation history compared to the ARIANE report, with variations of boron concentrations and temperatures at every irradiation step.…”
Section: Samples Assembly and Irradiation Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The justification for the observed variations is still not clear, and additional calculations would be necessary. It nevertheless shows that the decay heat is not sensibly affected by the thermal scattering data, given that the impact of other nuclear data are not less than 1% for cooling time longer than 1 year and burnup higher than 50 MWd/kgU [33,34].…”
Section: Decay Heatmentioning
confidence: 99%