2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00362-006-0001-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unbiasedly estimating the total of a stigmatizing variable from a complex survey on permitting options for direct or randomized responses

Abstract: Optional randomized response, Unbiased estimation, Varying probability sampling,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The technique of optional randomized response is used by allowing the respondent to reveal the true answer or to follow a prescribed randomized response technique depending on his own desire keeping the type of answer hidden to the interviewer (Mangat and Singh, 1994;Singh and Joarder, 1997;Gupta et al, 2002;Arnab, 2004;Pal, 2008;Chaudhuri and Dihidar, 2009). Here we show that irrespective of how a sample of respondents is chosen, the optional randomized response technique can be applied to Gjestvang and Singh's (2009) model and this application gains assured improvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique of optional randomized response is used by allowing the respondent to reveal the true answer or to follow a prescribed randomized response technique depending on his own desire keeping the type of answer hidden to the interviewer (Mangat and Singh, 1994;Singh and Joarder, 1997;Gupta et al, 2002;Arnab, 2004;Pal, 2008;Chaudhuri and Dihidar, 2009). Here we show that irrespective of how a sample of respondents is chosen, the optional randomized response technique can be applied to Gjestvang and Singh's (2009) model and this application gains assured improvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ORT is more efficient than compulsory randomized response technique (CRT) because the probability of obtaining true responses in ORT is much higher than that in the CRT (Arnab, 2004). PORT was discussed by many authors such as Mangat and Singh(1994), Gupta et al (2002Gupta et al ( , 2013, Pal (2008), Chaudhuri and Dihidar (2009), and Sanaullah et al (2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optional RR (ORR) technique was introduced by Chaudhuri and Mukerjee (1985). A large number of developments following Chaudhuri and Mukerjee (1985) approach were proposed by Gupta (2001), Gupta et al (2002), Pal (2008) and many others. Subsequent developments are due to Arnab (2004), Chaudhuri and Saha (2005), Saha (2007), Huang (2008), Arnab and Rueda (2016) among others with slight differences in approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%