2022
DOI: 10.1117/1.jmm.21.2.024001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unbiased line edge roughness measurement using profile-averaging method for precise roughness parameters measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the simulation results contain higher bias than the theoretical results in the high-frequency region of the PSD, even after averaging 10 000 profiles. Additional bias might be introduced by the finite point interval of the generated profile [30]. In contrast, the theoretical and simulated HHCFs well agree in the low-lag region (corresponding to the highfrequency region of the PSD), indicating that the noisecorrection technique is effective.…”
Section: Psds and Hhcfs Of Typical Noise-included Roughness Profiles:...mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Note that the simulation results contain higher bias than the theoretical results in the high-frequency region of the PSD, even after averaging 10 000 profiles. Additional bias might be introduced by the finite point interval of the generated profile [30]. In contrast, the theoretical and simulated HHCFs well agree in the low-lag region (corresponding to the highfrequency region of the PSD), indicating that the noisecorrection technique is effective.…”
Section: Psds and Hhcfs Of Typical Noise-included Roughness Profiles:...mentioning
confidence: 86%