1978
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4616/4/7/021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unaccompanied hadron flux at a depth of 730 g cm-2, 102<E<104GeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From simulations we find [18][19][20][30][31][32][33][34] for references) and model predictions. The inner error bars are statistical, while the outer include systematic uncertainties for a helium fraction of 25 % and 10 mb for the systematic uncertainty attributed to the fraction of photons.…”
Section: Determination Of the Cross-sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From simulations we find [18][19][20][30][31][32][33][34] for references) and model predictions. The inner error bars are statistical, while the outer include systematic uncertainties for a helium fraction of 25 % and 10 mb for the systematic uncertainty attributed to the fraction of photons.…”
Section: Determination Of the Cross-sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the proton one. Its measurement has been carried on in the past, both at sea level [1][2][3][4][5][6] and at mountain altitude [7][8][9][10][11], using different experimental techniques, like emulsion chambers, magnetic spectrometers and calorimeters. The knowledge of the primary proton spectrum is of main relevance for the understanding of the cosmic rays acceleration mechanisms and of the propagation processes in the Galaxy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result of this work is shown in comparison to other experimental results ( [28], [1], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [2], [34]). In addition, the high energy models (QGSJETII.4, QGSJET01, SIBYLL, EPOS-LHC) cross section predictions are also shown by solid line, fine dashed line, dotted line, and dashed line consecutively.…”
Section: Proton-proton Cross Sectionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The result of the proton-air cross section is then compared to the results obtained from various experimental results ( [28], [1], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [2], [34]) Figures 7. In addition, the experimental results of the high energy models (QGSJETII.4, QGSJET01, SIBYLL, EPOS-LHC) cross section predictions are also included. This includes the statistical (outer/thinner error bar) and the systematic (inner/thicker error bar).…”
Section: Proton-air Cross Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%