Unaccompanied Adolescent Minors’ Experiences of Exception and Abandonment in the Ventimiglia Border Space

Abstract

This article explores unaccompanied adolescent minors’ (UAMs) experiences of deterrent practices at internal EU borders while being on the move. Previous studies have acknowledged the securitisation of external borders through gatekeeping and fencing practices; however, there is a recent and continued renationalisation of internal EU borders by the member states. Like other migrants who are travelling irregularly, UAMs also often face harsh living conditions and repeated rights violations in border areas, regardless of their specific rights to protection and psychological needs. Research has called for a renewed focus on migrant children’s experiences as active agents at the borders, but until now studies exploring UAMs’ experiences at internal EU borders remain scarce. Drawing on Agamben’s notion of “legal exception,” we seek to explore how deterrent practices are confusingly intertwined and affect UAMs’ psychological wellbeing and subjectivities in the Ventimiglia border space. Participant observations and in-depth interviews conducted with UAMs at the French-Italian border provide unique insights into how these bordering practices affect migrant children’s legal and psychological safety and reshape their subjectivities. This contribution highlights UAMs’ conflicting needs and feelings of institutional “abandonment” when left without institutional welfare protection in the border space, on the one hand, and feeling pressured to act responsibly towards their relatives, on the other.

It Happened in the Desert, in Libya and in Italy: Physical and Sexual Violence Experienced by Female Nigerian Victims of Trafficking in Italy

“…Research shows that "when certain situations or events exceed the individual's own capacities, general self-efficacy decreases, and this may play an important role in stress generation" [28] (p. 2). This is seen in the different mechanisms employed by the participants and how they are forced to make choices that may not always end their pain but, at least, lessen it, hereby contributing to the literature on migrants' trajectories, which show a continuous process of negotiations and disruptions [29,30].…”

Contested Appropriations: Informal Migrant Settlements as Ambiguous Spaces Beyond Temporal Borders

“…The number could be much higher now after the strategic downsizing of the Italian asylum system during the last years. Legislative developments regulating access to protection and reception after the infamous Salvini Decree have irregularized thousands of migrants and created a mobile and disenfranchised population outside official housing structures, making "camplessness" (Benedikt, 2020) a pervasive phenomenon (Della Puppa & Sanò, 2021b;Tazzioli, 2018a, p. 29;Tondo & Giuffrida, 2018;Uzureau et al, 2022). With the recent passing of the so-called Cutro Decree that shrinks access to protection even more, the situation is estimated to further worsen (ECRE, 2023).…”

Loops of Violence(s) Within Europe’s Governance of Migration in Libya, Italy, Greece, and Belgium

“…As forms of non-linear violence, these pushbacks and the prolonged waits in informal camps produce psychological strain. As reported by Uzureau et al (2022), while waiting for the next attempt to cross the border, UMs felt increasing anxiety, fear, and the inability to get any clear view of their future. In these informal camps, UMs often experience other forms of violence, which may be inflicted on them by law enforcement officials.…”