2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2021.03.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UMG silicon for solar PV: From defects detection to PV module degradation

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous mass production test, performed in commercial solar cells and modules production lines, this feedstock has proven to be appropriate for PV applications (Forniés et al, 2019), reaching, in a conventional production line, up to 20.76% of solar cell efficiency with multicrystalline cells made of 100% UMG silicon. Additional results have been recently presented (Fornies et al, 2021), on defect engineering and outdoor degradation of UMG-Si PV modules compared to polysilicon, including some partial results presented in the present work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In a previous mass production test, performed in commercial solar cells and modules production lines, this feedstock has proven to be appropriate for PV applications (Forniés et al, 2019), reaching, in a conventional production line, up to 20.76% of solar cell efficiency with multicrystalline cells made of 100% UMG silicon. Additional results have been recently presented (Fornies et al, 2021), on defect engineering and outdoor degradation of UMG-Si PV modules compared to polysilicon, including some partial results presented in the present work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The resulting ingots were sliced in 15x15 cm 2 wafers of 200±5 μm thickness with resistivity values ranging from 1 to 1.7 Ω•cm, as shown later on. Three different types of UMG-Si wafers were analyzed and processed: monocrystalline wafers labelled as "mono", and two types of mc-Si wafers labelled as A-type and B-type wafers, which have different impurity contents, as described elsewhere [29]. The compensation level of the UMG material used in this study and defined as (NA+ND)/(NA-ND), where NA and ND are the concentrations of p-type and n-type dopants, respectively, varies along the ingot between 2 and 4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our goal is to find a way to reduce this cost by using a cheap raw material, such as the upgraded metallurgical (UMG) silicon as solar-grade silicon (SoG) [1]. This silicon is less expensive than polysilicon due to its quality according to the impurities level; but it can be used for solar cells production with proper production process [2]. In addition, the growth rate, thermal gradient and fluid convection (natural or forced) are predominant IOP Publishing doi:10.1088/1757-899X/1223/1/012001 2 factors that may affect the segregation of impurities in the final solidification process, whether for alloys [3][4][5] or pure material production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%