2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00266-006-0225-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Umbilical Reinsertion in Abdominoplasty: Technique Using Deepithelialized Skin Flaps

Abstract: One goal of abdominoplasty is to reestablish a natural-appearing umbilicus with hidden scars. The authors present a new technique for navel reinsertion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reconstruction of the navel region has been previously reported after surgical excision [13, 14, 15]. However, sometimes it is a difficult procedure to perform because of the wide excision necessary to remove the cancerous material, as was the case with our patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Reconstruction of the navel region has been previously reported after surgical excision [13, 14, 15]. However, sometimes it is a difficult procedure to perform because of the wide excision necessary to remove the cancerous material, as was the case with our patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Other techniques described include a “scarless” umbilicoplasty which attempts to hide the scar [11]. Castillo et al [12] described adding a de-epithelialized flap to reinforce the transposed umbilicus using a Y-shaped design. Rozen and Redett [13] described a two-dermal-flap technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2007, Rozen and Redett [13] described an oval shaped incision after which the de-epithelialized dermal flap was incised along the midline, creating two symmetrical flaps. In the same year, Castillo et al [14] used a Y design, de-epithelializing two bilateral triangular flaps and leaving a superior triangular skin flap to coincide with a triangular superior cut made in the navel. While both methods reported successful results, we did not wish to perform an incision in the umbilical skin as in the method by Castillo et al [14], and decided on an oval incision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same year, Castillo et al [14] used a Y design, de-epithelializing two bilateral triangular flaps and leaving a superior triangular skin flap to coincide with a triangular superior cut made in the navel. While both methods reported successful results, we did not wish to perform an incision in the umbilical skin as in the method by Castillo et al [14], and decided on an oval incision. We also noted that the two symmetrical flaps pulled down by Rozen and Redett [13] resulted in a relatively round navel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%