Abstract:ResumoO objetivo desse artigo é contribuir empiricamente para a mensuração do atual estágio de desenvolvimento do campo específico das relações internacionais no contexto das Ciências Humanas, ao longo da década de sua consolidação, ou seja, entre [2004][2005][2006][2007][2008][2009][2010][2011][2012][2013][2014]. A hipótese é que o grau de crescimento do período de consolidação não se sustenta na mesma proporção, no entanto sua mensuração contribui para análises de cenário e perspectiva futura.
AbstractThe pu… Show more
“…In the 1990s, driven by global interdependence, the expansion of international commerce and finance, and the deepening of regional integration in South America (Jatobá 2013;Vigevani, Thomas and Leite 2016;Tostes and Silva 2017;Milani 2021), the first wave of undergraduate programs emerged mainly at pontifical and private universities and research centres (Miyamoto 2003;Pecequilo 2017). In such context, the Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo (PUC-SP), the Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais (PUC Minas), and the Catholic University of Brasília (UCB) created their IR undergraduate programs.…”
Section: Early Institutionalization Of Ir In the Second Half Of The 2...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, a new wave of expansion began with governmental support for opening new International Relations programs in Brazilian top public universities (Miyamoto 2010;Jatobá 2013;Pecequilo 2017). In such context, for example, the University of São Paulo (USP), the State University of São Paulo (UNESP), and the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) created undergraduate IR programs, and by 2005 the country already had over 100 active undergraduate IR programs (Lessa 2005b;Santos and Fonseca 2009;Miyamoto 2010;Ferreira 2015;Tostes and Silva 2017).…”
Section: The 21 St -Century Scenario: From Expansion To Stagnationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on International Relations (IR) as an academic discipline in Brazil has been pumping in the last 20 years (Miyamoto 1999(Miyamoto , 2003(Miyamoto , 2010Herz 2002;Lessa 2005aLessa , 2005bVizentini 2005;Santos and Fonseca 2009;Julião 2012;Jatobá 2013;Salomón and Pinheiro 2013;Barasuol and Silva 2016;Ferreira 2016;Vigevani, Thomaz and Leite 2016;Pecequilo 2017;Tostes and Silva 2017;Ramos and Scotelaro 2018;Fonseca Júnior and Uziel 2019;Scotelaro 2019;Pfrimer and Okado 2019;Milani 2021). They are mainly historiographical studies concerned with discovering prevailing traditions, perspectives, themes, and early contributors to Brazilian IR (Vizentini 2005;Salomón and Pinheiro 2013;Barasuol and Silva 2016;Milani 2021), unveiling the institutionalization of IR in Brazilian universities in the second half of the 20 th century (Herz 2002;Lessa 2005aLessa , 2005bJulião 2012;Jatobá 2013;Fonseca Júnior and Uziel 2019;Milani 2021), and exploring the acceleration and state great area of IR in Brazil.…”
In this article, we present a new dataset covering metadata on 14 Brazilian International Relations (BIR) journals and more than 5000 articles published between 1997 and 2021. We collected the data by harvesting the journals’ public web pages via web scraping and later cleaned and structured the information in a rectangular format. A complete understanding of the International Relations field in Brazil requires a deep analysis of the ecosystem of IR academic journals and engaging explicitly and exclusively with scientific articles published in such venues. But, as of today, scientometric analysis covering BIR is rare and limited, as primary indexing sources and popular databases do not fully cover Brazilian International Relations journals. By presenting and publishing the dataset we aim to overcome such a barrier and encourage further scientometric studies in the country.
“…In the 1990s, driven by global interdependence, the expansion of international commerce and finance, and the deepening of regional integration in South America (Jatobá 2013;Vigevani, Thomas and Leite 2016;Tostes and Silva 2017;Milani 2021), the first wave of undergraduate programs emerged mainly at pontifical and private universities and research centres (Miyamoto 2003;Pecequilo 2017). In such context, the Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo (PUC-SP), the Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais (PUC Minas), and the Catholic University of Brasília (UCB) created their IR undergraduate programs.…”
Section: Early Institutionalization Of Ir In the Second Half Of The 2...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, a new wave of expansion began with governmental support for opening new International Relations programs in Brazilian top public universities (Miyamoto 2010;Jatobá 2013;Pecequilo 2017). In such context, for example, the University of São Paulo (USP), the State University of São Paulo (UNESP), and the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) created undergraduate IR programs, and by 2005 the country already had over 100 active undergraduate IR programs (Lessa 2005b;Santos and Fonseca 2009;Miyamoto 2010;Ferreira 2015;Tostes and Silva 2017).…”
Section: The 21 St -Century Scenario: From Expansion To Stagnationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on International Relations (IR) as an academic discipline in Brazil has been pumping in the last 20 years (Miyamoto 1999(Miyamoto , 2003(Miyamoto , 2010Herz 2002;Lessa 2005aLessa , 2005bVizentini 2005;Santos and Fonseca 2009;Julião 2012;Jatobá 2013;Salomón and Pinheiro 2013;Barasuol and Silva 2016;Ferreira 2016;Vigevani, Thomaz and Leite 2016;Pecequilo 2017;Tostes and Silva 2017;Ramos and Scotelaro 2018;Fonseca Júnior and Uziel 2019;Scotelaro 2019;Pfrimer and Okado 2019;Milani 2021). They are mainly historiographical studies concerned with discovering prevailing traditions, perspectives, themes, and early contributors to Brazilian IR (Vizentini 2005;Salomón and Pinheiro 2013;Barasuol and Silva 2016;Milani 2021), unveiling the institutionalization of IR in Brazilian universities in the second half of the 20 th century (Herz 2002;Lessa 2005aLessa , 2005bJulião 2012;Jatobá 2013;Fonseca Júnior and Uziel 2019;Milani 2021), and exploring the acceleration and state great area of IR in Brazil.…”
In this article, we present a new dataset covering metadata on 14 Brazilian International Relations (BIR) journals and more than 5000 articles published between 1997 and 2021. We collected the data by harvesting the journals’ public web pages via web scraping and later cleaned and structured the information in a rectangular format. A complete understanding of the International Relations field in Brazil requires a deep analysis of the ecosystem of IR academic journals and engaging explicitly and exclusively with scientific articles published in such venues. But, as of today, scientometric analysis covering BIR is rare and limited, as primary indexing sources and popular databases do not fully cover Brazilian International Relations journals. By presenting and publishing the dataset we aim to overcome such a barrier and encourage further scientometric studies in the country.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.