2023
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202370101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrathin Carbon Coating and Defect Engineering Promote RuO2 as an Efficient Catalyst for Acidic Oxygen Evolution Reaction with Super‐High Durability (Adv. Energy Mater. 23/2023)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3a shows that the OER catalysed by the V-Ru x Mn 1−x O 2 NWs has an onset potential of 1.37 V (E on ) and they only need an overpotential of ∼200.0 mV to drive a current density of 10 mA cm −2 (h 10 ). The OER activity of the V-Ru x Mn 1−x O 2 NWs is much higher than those of com-RuO 2 (E on = 1.44 V and h 10 = 302.0 mV, close to the reported values 10,24 ) and commercial IrO 2 (com-IrO 2 , E on = 1.47 V and h 10 = 330 mV, close to the reported values 25,26 ). In particular, the h 10 value of V-Ru x Mn 1−x O 2 NWs is lower than that of other acidic OER catalysts reported recently, such as Ni-RuO 2 (214.0 mV) 18 and Si-RuO x @C (220.0 mV) 24 (Table S1 †).…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3a shows that the OER catalysed by the V-Ru x Mn 1−x O 2 NWs has an onset potential of 1.37 V (E on ) and they only need an overpotential of ∼200.0 mV to drive a current density of 10 mA cm −2 (h 10 ). The OER activity of the V-Ru x Mn 1−x O 2 NWs is much higher than those of com-RuO 2 (E on = 1.44 V and h 10 = 302.0 mV, close to the reported values 10,24 ) and commercial IrO 2 (com-IrO 2 , E on = 1.47 V and h 10 = 330 mV, close to the reported values 25,26 ). In particular, the h 10 value of V-Ru x Mn 1−x O 2 NWs is lower than that of other acidic OER catalysts reported recently, such as Ni-RuO 2 (214.0 mV) 18 and Si-RuO x @C (220.0 mV) 24 (Table S1 †).…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…3 Tremendous work has demonstrated that the electronic structure of the active sites is the major factor determining the activity of the catalysts, since it governs the adsorption of reactants, the transformation of intermediates, and the desorption of products. 10 Generally, the methods used for the modulation of the electronic structure of the active sites include metal doping, 11 vacancy generation, 12 active facet control, 13 heterostructuring, 7 etc. As reported previously, metal doping can optimize the electronic structure of the active sites at the catalyst surface through charge redistribution, which lowers the energy barrier of the rate-determining step (RDS) for the OER.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings underscore the high intrinsic catalytic activity of ZnFeNiCuCoRu‐O in the OER. [ 20 ] In addition, the alkaline OER performance of the ZnFeNiCuCoRu‐O catalysts outperforms most previously reported OER electrocatalysts (Figure S12b and Table S4, Supporting Information) in terms of η 0.1 mA cm −2 (ECSA) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…[27][28][29] Since the electrolysis of water for hydrogen production has entered the field of research, a large number of metal-based OER catalysts have been developed, spanning metal oxides, sulfur compounds, nitrides, phosphides, and beyond. [30][31][32][33] Two-dimensional materials including metal halides, metal oxides, metal hydroxides have attracted much attention due to their significant advantages in exposing multiple active sites. [34][35][36] This article focuses predominantly on summary OER catalysts grounded in layered metal oxides (LMOs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%