1973
DOI: 10.1093/aesa/66.1.154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrastructure of Lepidopteran Sperm within Spermathecae1,2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most intriguing implications of this subject matter are the maintenance of types of spermatozoa without the same probability of fertilization. There are some possible explanations for this, as follows: (i) it may enhance male fertilization success as a "mating plug" (Woodward, 1940;Bellis, 1988, 1989;Ladle and Foster, 1992); (ii) provide nutrients to females (Riemann and Gassner, 1973;Sivinski, 1980Sivinski, , 1984; or (iii) represent a fertilization strategy that is different from that of spermatozoa bundles (Joly et al, 1991;Till-Bottraud et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most intriguing implications of this subject matter are the maintenance of types of spermatozoa without the same probability of fertilization. There are some possible explanations for this, as follows: (i) it may enhance male fertilization success as a "mating plug" (Woodward, 1940;Bellis, 1988, 1989;Ladle and Foster, 1992); (ii) provide nutrients to females (Riemann and Gassner, 1973;Sivinski, 1980Sivinski, , 1984; or (iii) represent a fertilization strategy that is different from that of spermatozoa bundles (Joly et al, 1991;Till-Bottraud et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sperm ultrastructure has been examined in some Micropterigidae and Exoporia (Sonnenschein & Häuser 1990;Friedländer 1983 a, b;Hamon & Chauvin 1992), but monotrysian Heteroneura remain unstudied. Exemplars of several families across the Ditrysia have been surveyed by Phillips (1971): and Riemann & Gassner (1973), while single-species treatments include studies of members of Tortricidae (Friedländer & Benz 1981), Pyralidae (Ashrafl & Roppel 1973;Friedländer 1976Friedländer , 1983Friedländer & Miesel 1977, Wolf 1997, Bombycoidea-Saturniidae (Friedländer et al 1981) and -Bombycidae (Yasuzumi & Oura 1964King & Akai 1971 a, b;Friedländer & Gitay 1972), butterflies (LaiFook 1982 a, Zylberberg 1969, Mancini & Dolder 2001, Noctuoidea-Noctuidae (LaChance & Olstad 1988, Medeiros & Silveira 1996, -Lymantriidae (Leclercq-Smekens 1978 a, b;Garvey 2000) and -Arctiidae (Trandaburu et al 1976). The comprehensive treatise by Jamieson et al (1999) forms the principal basis for the following account, and it must be consulted for further details.…”
Section: Spermatozoamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many animals, the parasperm do not persist in female sperm storage areas, suggesting that these parasperm could break down and serve as a nutritional gift to the fertilizing sperm, the female and/or to offspring (Schrader, 1960; Richards, 1963; Riemann & Gassner, 1973; Sivinski, 1980; Buckland‐Nicks, 1998). The likelihood of insect parasperm serving this function is low primarily because most sperm heteromorphic insects transfer sperm in packages containing energetically expensive seminal fluids that probably provide much more nutrition than the simple parasperm could (Swallow & Wilkinson, 2002).…”
Section: Nutritive Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%