1980
DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.62.5.945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrastructural evidence of microvascular damage and myocardial cell injury after coronary artery occlusion: which comes first?

Abstract: Both microvascular damage and myocardial cell injury occur after coronary occlusion, but the relationship of these two events is unclear; specifically, it is unknown whether microvascular damage causes myocardial cell injury. Dogs were subjected to coronary occlusion for 20, 40, 60, 90 or 180 minutes, after which subendocardial and subepicardial biopsies were obtained for electron and light microscopy of 1-mu sections. Of 312 biopsies of ischemic myocadium, 181 showed myocardial cell injury with no microvascul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
166
1
11

Year Published

1983
1983
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 466 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
166
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Each dog was anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital, 25 mg/kg, intubated, ventilated with a Harvard respirator and maintained with 0.25% halothane. An arterial line was placed in the left femoral artery to measure arterial pressure and for withdrawal of a reference blood sample during radioactive microsphere injection.…”
Section: Experimental Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each dog was anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital, 25 mg/kg, intubated, ventilated with a Harvard respirator and maintained with 0.25% halothane. An arterial line was placed in the left femoral artery to measure arterial pressure and for withdrawal of a reference blood sample during radioactive microsphere injection.…”
Section: Experimental Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this rationale, thrombaspiration, protection devices and coronary vasodilators are used to reduce peri-interventional reperfusion injury [9]. However, vice versa there may be primary damage to cardiomyocytes which only subsequently progresses to coronary microvascular damage, as seen in animal models with mechanical occlusion/reperfusion of virgin coronary arteries without a culprit lesion [14]. Whether cardiomyocyte damage per se is causal for subsequent coronary microvascular damage or both are consequences of the same fundamental pathomechanism, e.g., excessive reactive oxygen species formation, remains unclear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7] The failure to achieve adequate tissue perfusion is referred to as the no-reflow phenomenon, which occurs as a result of microvascular damage or intramyocardial edema induced by ischemia. 8,9 On angiograms, the no-reflow phenomenon is defined as substantial coronary antegrade flow reduction (less than Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] flow grade 3) without epicardial mechanical obstruction. 10 Recent studies have shown that angiographic contrast velocity after successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), as defined by the TIMI criteria, predicts poor left ventricular (LV) functional recovery and a higher risk of cardiac mortality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%