Ultrastructural cytology of pea leaves and roots infected by pea seedborne mosaic virus

Hampton, R. O.; Phillips, S M; Knesek, John E.; Mink, G. I.

doi:10.1007/bf01265649

Cited by 14 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 16 publications

(16 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, in our experiments, crystalline inclusion bodies of PSbMV were consistently observed in the cytoplasm of the infected cells. Similar findings have been reported by other workers (Hampton et al, 1973;Mili&jadnr;ic and Plavsic, 1978 (Hiebert et al, 1984 (Lawson and Hearon, 1971;Weintraub et al, 1974;McMullen and Gardner, 1980), virus particles and viral coat proteins (Langenberg, 1986). With PSbMV, pinwheel inclusion bodies have been found associated with particles in negative staining (Inouye, 1971 (Langenberg, 1986), PSbMV pinwheel inclusion bodies are involved in virus cell-to-cell spread.…”

Section: Confirmation Of Antiserum Specificitysupporting

confidence: 91%

“…With pea seedborne mosaic virus (PSbMV) in pea (Pisum sativum L) 2 distinctive types of cytoplasmic inclusion body, the pinwheel type and the crystalline type, have been described (Inouye, 1971; Hampton et al, 1973;Mili&jadnr;ic and Plavsic, 1978). An antiserum to the pinwheel inclusion body protein of PSbMV has been prepared and used in enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to detect the protein during PSbMV infection (Alconero et al, 1986).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Detection of pea seed-borne mosaic virus virion and pinwheel inclusion body proteins in leaf and seed tissues of pea (Pisum sativum L) by immunogold labelling

Wang

Woods²,

Swaby³

et al. 1991

Agronomie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Confirmation Of Antiserum Specificitysupporting

confidence: 91%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Detection of pea seed-borne mosaic virus virion and pinwheel inclusion body proteins in leaf and seed tissues of pea (Pisum sativum L) by immunogold labelling

Wang

Woods²,

Swaby³

et al. 1991

Agronomie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The U.S. isolates varied about as much as those from the other three countries. Ultrastructurally discernible differences among U.S. isolates were reported previously (Hampton, 1973). Isolates E210 and E224 were least typical by the criterion of symptoms induced in plant hosts but were serologically indistinguishable from other isolates.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 57%

Host differentiation and serological homology of pea seed-borne mosaic virus isolates

Hampton

Mink

Bos³

et al. 1981

Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Seven isolates of pea seed-borne mosaic virus (PSbMV) were compared on selected Pisum sativum L. differentials and by microprecipitin and SDS-gel serology and particle length. All isolates were characterized by 750 nm particle-length modes and were closely related serologically, but some were readily distinguished on P. sativum differentials. Isolate distinctions were of the magnitude typical for virus strains. Differentials, diverse Pisum germplasm from U.S. Plant Introduction accessions, provided a practical means of PSbMV strain differentiation.

show abstract

“…Considerable information has been published on detection (8)(9)(10)(11)18,21,23), purification (15,24), chemical and physical properties (4,10,13,15), and seed and aphid transmission (1,6,12,17,18,20,21,23). Economical control measures include eradication and isolation (12) and genetic resistance (2,3,7,16).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Crop Losses from Pea Seedborne Mosaic Virus in Six Processing Pea Cultivars

Kraft¹,

Hampton²

1980

Plant Dis.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Field responses of six processing pea cultivars to pea seedborne mosaic virus were tested in an isolated location near Prosser, WA, in 1977 and 1978. Test plots were mechanically inoculated either 2 or 3 wk after emergence. Disease incidence, determined visually on a per plant basis, was higher in all plots in 1977 than in 1978 and generally corresponded with rate of seed transmission and loss in green pea and seed yields. The later maturing, more determinate cultivars (Mars, Conway, and Corfu) were more severely affected than earlier maturing, indeterminate cultivars (Small Sieve Alaska and A-45) in both years. Losses in green pea and seed yields in 1977 were greater in plots of all cultivars inoculated 2 wk after emergence than in those inoculated 3 wk after emergence. Pea seedborne mosaic virus (PSbMV) is a continuing threat to the pea (Pisum sativum L.) seed and processing industry in the United States (12,17,20,22). This Contribution of AR, SEA, USDA, in cooperation with the Agricultural Experiment Stations,

show abstract

Ultrastructural cytology of pea leaves and roots infected by pea seedborne mosaic virus

Cited by 14 publications

References 16 publications

Detection of pea seed-borne mosaic virus virion and pinwheel inclusion body proteins in leaf and seed tissues of pea (Pisum sativum L) by immunogold labelling

Detection of pea seed-borne mosaic virus virion and pinwheel inclusion body proteins in leaf and seed tissues of pea (Pisum sativum L) by immunogold labelling

Host differentiation and serological homology of pea seed-borne mosaic virus isolates

Crop Losses from Pea Seedborne Mosaic Virus in Six Processing Pea Cultivars

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About