2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02762011000700004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound versus biological markers in the evaluation of periportal fibrosis in human Schistosoma mansoni

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On top (Domingues et al 2011) exhibited that only the serum HA level versus other biological markers was capable of demarcating patients with mild from those with intense periportal fibrosis in human S.mansoni. Our present study demonstrated that serum HA level was significantly increased in S.mansoni patients when compared to control group individuals, which is consistent with reports suggested that HA a useful marker for evaluating schistosomiasis morbidity and yet capable of monitoring hepatic fibrosis reversal following appropriate therapy (Eboumbou et al 2005;Domingues et al 2011). Additionally; our results exposed direct significant correlation between plasma MDA and Schistosoma-provoked periportal fibrosis, proposing that plasma MDA could be a favorable indicative marker for hepatic fibrosis in Schistosoma patients, plus implying an important role of lipid peroxidation byproducts in Schistosoma induced pathophysiology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On top (Domingues et al 2011) exhibited that only the serum HA level versus other biological markers was capable of demarcating patients with mild from those with intense periportal fibrosis in human S.mansoni. Our present study demonstrated that serum HA level was significantly increased in S.mansoni patients when compared to control group individuals, which is consistent with reports suggested that HA a useful marker for evaluating schistosomiasis morbidity and yet capable of monitoring hepatic fibrosis reversal following appropriate therapy (Eboumbou et al 2005;Domingues et al 2011). Additionally; our results exposed direct significant correlation between plasma MDA and Schistosoma-provoked periportal fibrosis, proposing that plasma MDA could be a favorable indicative marker for hepatic fibrosis in Schistosoma patients, plus implying an important role of lipid peroxidation byproducts in Schistosoma induced pathophysiology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serum levels of these biomarkers are significantly elevated with the progression of hepatic fibrosis and are hence important in qualitative and quantitative assessments of pathological status, including related complications, and also in monitoring the response to treatment. Procollagen III amino-terminal peptide, laminin, hyaluronic acid, chitinase 3-like protein 1, procollagen I carboxy-terminal peptide, procollagen IV C and N peptides, and metalloproteinase inhibitors are some examples of these biomarkers (294)(295)(296). In addition, different indices, based on routine investigative findings, are relevant in the assessment of hepatic disease.…”
Section: Diagnosis and Evaluation Of Schistosome-induced Liver Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, different indices, based on routine investigative findings, are relevant in the assessment of hepatic disease. The aspartate amino transferase/platelet ratio index (APRI) is one such commonly considered indirect tool (296,297). Furthermore, a recent study suggested the possible application of the international normalized ratio (INR) and hyaluronic acid in estimating the degree of hepatic damage (298).…”
Section: Diagnosis and Evaluation Of Schistosome-induced Liver Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…63,64 Many of these biomarkers have been evaluated and found useful in the diagnosis and grading of liver fibrosis caused by several conditions, including chronic viral hepatitis, alcoholic cirrhosis, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, and schistosomiasis. 65 However, their ability to identify and grade liver fibrosis in schistosomiasis at the community level in endemic areas needs further evaluation. The performance of some direct serum markers in the evaluation of schistosome-induced hepatic fibrosis is discussed below and is summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Serum Biological Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%