1981
DOI: 10.1016/0041-624x(81)90114-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound propagation in ‘in vivo’ bone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultrasound produces physiological mechanical stress in the bone that causes its deformation. This deformation causes the generation of potential differences in the cells which causes bone remodelling [43]. Low intensity ultrasound produces nonthermal effect which causes stable cavitation, microstreaming, and mechanical effect on the cell membrane [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasound produces physiological mechanical stress in the bone that causes its deformation. This deformation causes the generation of potential differences in the cells which causes bone remodelling [43]. Low intensity ultrasound produces nonthermal effect which causes stable cavitation, microstreaming, and mechanical effect on the cell membrane [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, US waves cause mechanical pressure on the cell surface, which could activate the stretch receptors of cation channels on the cell membrane and affect intracellular gene expression . Third, since bone has the ability to remodel depending on functional demands, the mechanical stresses produced by low‐intensity pulsed US could help in remodeling of the bone microarchitecture …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasound is a biophysical intervention that is capable of generating piezo-electric effects in bone (Behari and Singh, 1981), and increasing electric potentials in bone (Klug, 1983). Using 1.27-MHz ultrasound with a very low intensity of 0.00383 W cm -2 on bone, Behari and Singh (1981) measured an electric potential of 64 V at the ultrasound frequency in vivo. In a 21-day-old rabbit tibial fracture, there is an increase in callus potential of 0.9 mV during application of 880-kHz low-intensity ultrasound of 0.01 W cm -2 (Klug, 1983).…”
Section: Piezo-electric Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%