2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound-Guided Intrauterine Injection of Lipopolysaccharide as a Novel Model of Preterm Birth in the Mouse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In mice, systemic inflammation can cause progesterone withdrawal due to the regression of the corpus luteum, triggering preterm birth (109). Localized intrauterine inflammation can be induced in mice by injecting agents into the uterine horn between the gestational sacs (88). Most commonly, this has been done by mini-laparotomy to expose the uterine horns (96); however, such procedure could induce adverse pregnancy outcomes due to a rapid localized inflammatory response that surrounds the incision area.…”
Section: Animal Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In mice, systemic inflammation can cause progesterone withdrawal due to the regression of the corpus luteum, triggering preterm birth (109). Localized intrauterine inflammation can be induced in mice by injecting agents into the uterine horn between the gestational sacs (88). Most commonly, this has been done by mini-laparotomy to expose the uterine horns (96); however, such procedure could induce adverse pregnancy outcomes due to a rapid localized inflammatory response that surrounds the incision area.…”
Section: Animal Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most commonly, this has been done by mini-laparotomy to expose the uterine horns (96); however, such procedure could induce adverse pregnancy outcomes due to a rapid localized inflammatory response that surrounds the incision area. In the last few years, new less-invasive techniques have been developed, including ultrasound-guided intraamniotic and intrauterine injection of TLR, thus minimizing the effects of surgery (88). Similarly, ultrasound-guided intraamniotic injection has been used in a variety of species.…”
Section: Animal Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, in nonhuman primates, administration of a TLR4 antagonist before LPS challenge inhibited uterine contractility and reduced proinflammatory cytokine production [86]. In mice, TLR4 stimulation induces PTB [87], whereas its blockade reduced LPS-induced PTB [88,89]. Moreover, TLR4 mutant mice are protected from LPS-induced PTB [88,90].…”
Section: Innate Immune Response Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The timing and frequency of injections also differs throughout studies; we administered a single injection at day 17 of gestation (because LPS injection at this time point leads to preterm delivery (26)), whereas Scharfe and colleagues gave a single injection between days 10 and 14 of gestation. Interestingly, it may be worth noting that despite their findings of fetal resorption, the systemic inflammation that is seen in studies using LPS-induced sPTB models (26) was not observed after administration of fetal DNA. It is possible that the human fetal DNA used could not induce sufficient inflammation to cause sPTB or that the fetal resorption observed was mediated by a pathway induced by injection between days 10 and 14 of gestation, but with a different outcome when stimuli were not introduced until day 17.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Placental DNA was chosen as a stimulus because cff-DNA (using a placental explant method) does not yield enough DNA for the in-vivo studies. Our in-vivo ultrasound guided intra-uterine model of sPTB was chosen because it is minimally invasive, allows for a more precisely targeted injection, and because LPS-injected animals have previously shown high rates of sPTB (26). We hypothesised that this model is more physiologically relevant than the intra-peritoneal injection of stimuli used in previous studies, which found that neither CpG nor mouse placental DNA induced adverse pregnancy outcomes in wildtype mice (27)(28)(29)(30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%