2009
DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0b013e31819b570e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement decreases complications and decreases placement attempts compared with the landmark technique in patients in a pediatric intensive care unit*

Abstract: US-guided CVC placement in children is associated with decreased number of anatomical sites attempted and decreased number of attempts to gain placement. Time to placement by residents was decreased with US, but not the time to placement by other operators. US guidance increased the use of internal jugular catheter placement and decreased artery punctures. US guidance did not improve success rates.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
136
1
11

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
12
136
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it is known that thrombosis is not usually associated with needle insertion but occur after catheter placement, we think that the reduced number of attemps reduces the vein trauma and the thrombosis as well. 3,16,17 Similar with our results Alten et al showed that there were fewer complications of venous thrombosis in patients where ultrasound was used compared with the standard landmark technique, but the results were not statistically significant. 18 No potential mechanical complications (arterial puncture, malposition, arrhythmia and pneumothorax) associated with catheter insertion occurred in our study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although it is known that thrombosis is not usually associated with needle insertion but occur after catheter placement, we think that the reduced number of attemps reduces the vein trauma and the thrombosis as well. 3,16,17 Similar with our results Alten et al showed that there were fewer complications of venous thrombosis in patients where ultrasound was used compared with the standard landmark technique, but the results were not statistically significant. 18 No potential mechanical complications (arterial puncture, malposition, arrhythmia and pneumothorax) associated with catheter insertion occurred in our study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In similarity to our results, Froeclich et al reported that the use of ultrasonography reduced complications and particularly the arterial puncture. 17 One patient in our study developed central line-associated bloodstream infection following insertion. The rate of infection was 1.22 per 1000 catheter days.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Published data support the use of ultrasound by acute care professionals not traditionally trained in the ultrasound technique in the emergency medicine, anesthesia and adult and pediatric critical care literature. [23][24][25][26][27][28] Most labor and delivery, as well as emergency departments routinely use portable ultrasound devices. Small portable devices are being used clinically in other areas of critical care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As to the number of attempts, Verghese et al (2000) found no difference in the number of arterial punctures when comparing both techniques [23]; nevertheless, the same authors reported, in 1999, a smaller number of attempts when CVC was guided by USG [24], which was to be later confirmed by Froelich et al (2009) [25]. Jijeh et al (2014) were successful at the first attempt in 75% of USG-guided punctures (mean time 3.9 minutes), 23% at the second one, and 2%…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%