Ultrasound-assisted Extraction of Fe (III) from Wet-process Phosphoric Acid

Lv, Xingbin; Liu, Daijun; Ji, Junyi; Chen, Jianjun; Yang, Tao

doi:10.15261/serdj.24.11

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 22 publications

(24 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Usually, commercial phosphoric acid is produced via hot-process or wet-process. And due to the low-cost and low-energy advantages of the wet-process, 90% of phosphoric acid is produced through the wet-process [2][3][4]. However, many impurities are introduced into WPA (wet-process phosphoric acid) production, and Mg may be the most annoying impurity because it can increase the viscosity of WPA [4][5][6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In a typical microfluidic reactor like the micro-channel, the organic phase and aqueous phase are limited in a specific space, leading to the enhancement of the mass transfer because of the significant increase of interface area and contact opportunity [27][28][29][30]. In our previous work, the extractant D2EHPA had shown great efficiency for the extraction of Fe 3+ in the UAME system [2,3]. However, D2EHPA showed less efficiency when dealing with Mg 2+ in WPA.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Ultrasound-Assisted Micro-Channel Extraction of Magnesium from Wet-Process Phosphoric Acid

Xia

Zhang

Hong

et al. 2022

SERDJ

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A new extractant PN-1 was synthesized, and an ultrasound-assisted micro-channel extraction (UAME) system was developed for the extraction of magnesium from wet-process phosphoric acid (WPA). The effects of O/A ratio, P 2 O 5 content, initial pH, ultrasound power, and aqueous phase ratio on extraction were investigated. The extraction efficiency of Mg 2+ could reach 89.09% under the conditions of 74 W ultrasound power, 4 O/A ratio, and 0.2 mL/min aqueous phase velocity. The response surface methodology (RSM) result indicated that O/A ratio and aqueous phase velocity have extremely significant influences on extraction efficiency, significant interaction existed between ultrasound power and aqueous phase velocity, and ultrasound power evidently reduced extraction time. Furthermore, the magnesium could be fully stripped by 1 mol/L H 2 SO 4 with a phase ratio lower than 2. Thus, the new extractant PN-1 and ultrasound-assisted microchannel extraction system are suitable for the extraction of magnesium from wet-process phosphoric acid.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ultrasound-Assisted Micro-Channel Extraction of Magnesium from Wet-Process Phosphoric Acid

Xia

Zhang

Hong

et al. 2022

SERDJ

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As a typical example, Xingbin Lv [13] found that ultrasound-assisted extraction was an effective technique for increasing the extraction ratio.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ultrasonic Assisted Microchannel Extraction of Fe(III) from Wet-Process Phosphoric Acid

Shuai

Xia

et al. 2019

SERDJ

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An ultrasonic assisted microchannel extraction (UAME) method was developed for the extraction of Fe(III) from wet-process phosphoric acid with di(2-ethylhexyl)phosphoric acid (D2EHPA). The influences of ultrasonic power, extractant concentration, water phase velocity and the ratio of the organic and aqueous phases (O/A) on the extraction rate of Fe(III) were systematically studied. The results showed that the extraction efficiency of Fe(III) reached 91.08%, which was significantly higher than that for ultrasound extraction and microchannel extraction respectively. Response surface methodology was adopted to obtain the optimal conditions and to evaluate the significance of variables affecting the extraction efficiency. The extraction efficiency of Fe(III) reached 92.24% under the following optimum conditions: extractant concentration, 2.1 mol/L; aqueous phase velocity, 0.055 mL/min; ratio of organic phase and aqueous phase, 2.98.

show abstract