1998
DOI: 10.1097/01241398-199807000-00030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonography: Can It Differentiate Between Vasoocclusive Crisis and Acute Osteomyelitis in Sickle Cell Disease?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has also the advantage of being rapid, non-invasive and fairly simple to target to the area(s) of maximum pain (Sidhu & Rich, 1999). The sensitivity of ultrasonography in diagnosing osteomyelitis in sickle cell disease has been reported to be as high as 74% (Rifai & Nyman, 1997;Sadat-Ali et al, 1998;William et al, 2000;Riebel et al, 2003). However, as with computer tomography (Stark et al, 1991), the main 'diagnostic' finding (subperiosteal fluid) is not specific and can also be present during vaso-occlusive crises, although greater fluid depths (>4 mm) are reported to be highly associated with a diagnosis of osteomyelitis (William et al, 2000).…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Osteomyelitis In Sickle Cell Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also the advantage of being rapid, non-invasive and fairly simple to target to the area(s) of maximum pain (Sidhu & Rich, 1999). The sensitivity of ultrasonography in diagnosing osteomyelitis in sickle cell disease has been reported to be as high as 74% (Rifai & Nyman, 1997;Sadat-Ali et al, 1998;William et al, 2000;Riebel et al, 2003). However, as with computer tomography (Stark et al, 1991), the main 'diagnostic' finding (subperiosteal fluid) is not specific and can also be present during vaso-occlusive crises, although greater fluid depths (>4 mm) are reported to be highly associated with a diagnosis of osteomyelitis (William et al, 2000).…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Osteomyelitis In Sickle Cell Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone scans are of limited utility [5,8]. Some studies report high reliability of US for the differentiation of bone infarct versus osteomyelitis in children with SCD because of US findings of soft-tissue abnormalities and subperiosteal collection [6,12,13]. However in our US experience and based on the results of this MRI study, soft-tissue changes and subperiosteal fluid collection occur in both processes, so these cannot accurately distinguish between the two.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Computed tomography (CT), ultrasonography (US) and enhanced MRI do not reliably distinguish these two entities [9][10][11][12][13]. To our knowledge, only a single article, with a population age 2-37 years, has suggested the use of unenhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighed images for the differentiation of bone infarct and osteomyelitis in children with SCD; Jain et al [14] reported areas of high bone marrow signal intensity in patients with bone infarct and areas of low bone marrow signal intensity in acute osteomyelitis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The US shows the extraosseous pathology in acute cases and may also show periosteal elevation [28]. The US test exhibits 74% sensitivity in diagnosis osteomyelitis in SCA [28][29][30][31]. However, the main diagnostic finding, i.e., the presence of subperiosteal fluid, is non-specific and can also be present during VOC [28].…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Osteomyelitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ciprofloxacin is considered as a suitable alternative for treating Salmonella infection in older children. In the case of adults, who have been infected with other species, such as Staphylococcus empirical antibiotic treatment should be followed [30]. In confirmed cases of osteomyelitis, a six-week treatment plan needs to be followed.…”
Section: Treatment Of Osteomyelitismentioning
confidence: 99%