2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2019.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonic non-destructive testing of complex titanium/carbon fibre composite joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The matrix material was a standard Epoxy resin. The volumetric density of the material was 1.14 g/cm 3 , while its compression and tensile modulus were 3.2 GPa and 3.0 GPa, respectively, measured at a temperature of 23 °C. The total thickness of the sample was 60 mm, with known standard defects, which were basically a series of side drilled holes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The matrix material was a standard Epoxy resin. The volumetric density of the material was 1.14 g/cm 3 , while its compression and tensile modulus were 3.2 GPa and 3.0 GPa, respectively, measured at a temperature of 23 °C. The total thickness of the sample was 60 mm, with known standard defects, which were basically a series of side drilled holes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasonic testing (UT) is the most widespread non-destructive testing (NDT) technique for the assessment of the structural integrity of highly attenuating and scattering materials, such as carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP), both during manufacturing and in service [1,2]. However, the multi-layered structure of the material poses a challenge for the sensitivity and resolution of the testing system, especially when the sample is thick and/or it has complex geometry [3]. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) achievable for the echo signal of a defect or the backwall is strongly limited by the multiple reflections due to the ply interfaces, a fact that limits the minimum detectable defect size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several techniques in application, including continuous wave (CW) imaging (single frequency or swept frequency excitation and single point or matrix detection) or time-domain spectroscopy (TDS) with femtosecond order pulsed excitation and detection using photoconductive antennas. The first setup enables higher power (and in consequence testing of thicker and more lossy structures) and faster inspection, while TDS enables spectroscopic information about an examined structure (dispersion curves and absorption peaks for specified frequencies correlated with specific molecules) [ 7 , 8 , 9 ] and relatively intuitive information about cross-section (in depth profile) because of operating principle similar to radar [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 25 ]. The excitation pulse is directed into the examined material and after interaction (reflection of interfaces having various dielectric properties) is picked up by a receiving antenna.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasonic testing of adhesive joints has been conducted for many years. These are mainly tests of steel–adhesive bonds [ 22 ], aluminum–adhesive bonds [ 23 ] and adhesive joints of composite materials [ 24 , 25 ]. Such kinds of research include defect searching in adhesive bonds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasonic NDT had been used to investigate the adhesive bond quality with adherend integrity and interface quality evaluation, including disbond detection [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ]. In addition, investigations to detect weak and kissing bonds have been performed in various studies [ 10 , 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%