1978
DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-51-608-628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonic measurement of renal inclination; its importance in measurement of renal length

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For ethical reasons, intravenous urograms can not be performed on healthy children. Furthermore, decrease in kidney size due to organ inclination, which is more pronounced on the right side [4,5], may explain the distinct side differences reported in several radiological studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For ethical reasons, intravenous urograms can not be performed on healthy children. Furthermore, decrease in kidney size due to organ inclination, which is more pronounced on the right side [4,5], may explain the distinct side differences reported in several radiological studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, a number of previous studies reported relatively consistent radiographic kidney size in various breeds of dogs, which may indicate that variable degrees of magnification of kidney and L2 lengths may not lead to significant deviations from the standard normal ranges of radiographic kidney size [6, 9, 11, 13, 19, 20]. In addition, one human study reported that renal inclination did not lead to significant error in the radiographic measurement of kidney length in most cases [10]. Second, actual kidney size was not measured by necropsy, and more accurate methods to measure kidney size using CT and MRI were not used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Renal investigations by sonography have been presented in several reports (Taylor & Hill, 1975;Littlewood, 1977;Cook, Rosenfield & Taylor, 1977, Weitzel, Troger & Straub, 1977Spigos, Capek & Jonasson, 1977;Farrant & Meire, 1978). Lyons, Fleming, Ameil, Murphy, Sweet & Donald (1972) have discussed the technical difficulties associated with this method in children and have de- signed a water-bath for more detailed studies of kidneys in newborn babies and infants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another factor causing magnification of kidney size is of chemical nature (Wolpert, 1965;Arkless, 1969). Rotation of the kidney around its transverse axis causes lower values of kidney length from radiographic measurements (Griffiths, Cartwright & McLachlan, 1974;Farrant & Meire, 1978).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%