2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3106020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonic Logging Image Denoising Based on CNN and Feature Attention

Abstract: Various kinds of noise will be produced during the process of ultrasonic logging in high temperature and high-pressure environment under oil wells, which is blurring the logging image. This paper presents a novel end-to-end denoising model (ULNet) based on CNN and feature attention to address this problem and remove the noise from ultrasonic logging images. Our method mainly includes feature attention, feature enhancement based on residual model and reconstruction for ultrasonic logging image. Feature enhancem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, comparing different algorithm models can help us understand their performance on various datasets and evaluation metrics. In this study, we evaluate the performance of MSAC-Net by comparing it with state-of-the-art algorithm models, including WNNM [14], SAR-BM3D [8], SAR-CNN [23], GAN [21], SAR2SAR [25], and AGSDNet [28]. To ensure a fair comparison, we utilize the default settings provided by the authors in their respective algorithm literature and calculate PSNR and SSIM as error metrics to comprehensively evaluate their practical application value.…”
Section: Comparison Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, comparing different algorithm models can help us understand their performance on various datasets and evaluation metrics. In this study, we evaluate the performance of MSAC-Net by comparing it with state-of-the-art algorithm models, including WNNM [14], SAR-BM3D [8], SAR-CNN [23], GAN [21], SAR2SAR [25], and AGSDNet [28]. To ensure a fair comparison, we utilize the default settings provided by the authors in their respective algorithm literature and calculate PSNR and SSIM as error metrics to comprehensively evaluate their practical application value.…”
Section: Comparison Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rudin et al [11] proposed a total variation (TV) model for denoising, which achieved good results in speckle noise removal despite the staircasing effect it produced. In recent years, literature [12][13][14] has made significant improvements and optimizations to the TV denoising algorithm. By minimizing the staircasing effect while preserving image edge information, the improved algorithm model maintains its adaptability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%