1985
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-00580-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultraschalldiagnostik in Geburtshilfe und Gynäkologie

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
14

Year Published

1986
1986
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…The score is classified as either normal (8-10 points), suspicious (5-7 points) or pathological ( < 5 points). The antenatal diagnosis of 1UGR was made on the basis of ultrasound growth charts of the biparietal and the transverse abdominal diameter accord ing to Hansmann et al [8] when at least one value was below the 5th centile.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The score is classified as either normal (8-10 points), suspicious (5-7 points) or pathological ( < 5 points). The antenatal diagnosis of 1UGR was made on the basis of ultrasound growth charts of the biparietal and the transverse abdominal diameter accord ing to Hansmann et al [8] when at least one value was below the 5th centile.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is not comparable to better results reported from the literature. 2 An expla· nation for this is the application of strict diagnostic criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From all pregnancies in which IUGR was sus pected in our hospital population during a 2-year peri od, patients were scheduled for intense surveillance, in which the abdominal diameter was less than the 5th centile according to Hansmann et al [5], Retrospec tively, cases were neglected where the last biophysical tests had not been performed within a period of 1-3 days before delivery. The mean gestational age at delivery was 37 + 1 weeks (27 + 4 to 40 + 1 weeks).…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%