Ultramicrostructure of hepatic cavernous hemangioma and its correlation with clinical characteristics

Sun, Xiaoli; Li, Guowei; Yang, Shaoyi; Li, Qingfeng; Wang, Zhiliang; Li, Zong-Fang

doi:10.11569/wcjd.v14.i32.3107

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…CHL, on the other hand, involves a vascular malformation of the liver arterioles. It has been observed that the veins which drain the CHL, the peripheral branches of the portal vein, have 85% oxyhemoglobin saturation [22] , [23] . This increased concentration of oxyhemoglobin in CHLs can therefore result in a decrease in R 2 * values.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Utility of R2* Obtained from T2*-Weighted Imaging in Differentiating Hepatocellular Carcinomas from Cavernous Hemangiomas of the Liver

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeTo evaluate the feasibility of applying R2* values to differentiate hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) from cavernous hemangiomas of the liver (CHL).Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study was approved by the participating Institutional Review Board and written informed consent for all subjects were obtained. Seventy-three patients with 79 pathologically identified HCCs and 65 patients with 91 clinically or pathologically identified CHLs were enrolled in this study. All subjects underwent a breath-hold multi-echo T2* weighted MR imaging on a 1.5T clinical MR scanner. R2* values from HCC and CHL groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney non-parametric U test. A cut-off value of R2* was evaluated with receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis.ResultsThe mean R2* value was 23.32±12.23 Hz (95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.58 Hz, 26.06 Hz) for the HCC group, and 3.66±2.37 Hz (95% CI: 3.17 Hz, 4.15 Hz) for the CHL group. The mean R2* value for HCC was significantly higher than that of CHL (p<0.001). A threshold of 9.48 Hz for the minimum R2* value in the diagnosis of HCC resulted in a sensitivity of 96.20% (76 out of 79 patients), and a specificity of 97.80% (89 out of 91 patients). The positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy for HCC were 97.44% (76 out of 78 patients), 96.74% (89 out of 92 patients) and 97.06% (165 out of 170 patients), respectively. The AUC for differentiation between these two groups was 0.994 (95% CI: 0.980, 1.000).ConclusionsR2* is a significant MRI biomarker to differentiate HCC from CHL with satisfying sensitivity and specificity.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%