“…In response to today’s ever-increasing global energy and environmental issues, the quest for sustainable and clean energy systems is constantly on the move. The electrochemical oxygen evolution reaction (OER) has been envisioned as playing an unequivocally vital role in a variety of decarbonized energy storage and energy conversion technologies, including water electrolyzers, rechargeable metal–air batteries, regenerative fuel cells, and electrochemical CO 2 reduction. , However, the sluggish kinetics associated with the four sequential proton-coupled electron-transfer processes involved in the OER (4OH – → 2H 2 O + O 2 + 4e – in base), which rely on two steps of O–H bond cleavage and one rigid OO bond formation, severely compromise the overall efficiency of electrochemical systems. − Up to now, in order to promote the reaction rate, noble metal-based catalysts, such as commercial RuO 2 and IrO 2 oxides, still occupy the benchmark position in the OER catalysts, while their unaffordable price and scarcity severely restrict their commercialization in practical devices. − With such concerns, relentless efforts from both industry and academia alike have been devoted to the development of a myriad of alternative OER catalysts based on cost-effective elements (Ni, Co, Fe, and Mn) or their compounds, which would be a very promising answer to the aforesaid problems. − In particular, earth-abundant and environmentally friendly transition metal oxides (TMOs), especially Ni-based materials, have exhibited excellent performance in OER catalysis, taking advantage of their reasonable activity and reactivity, since the OER activities of single TMOs follow the order NiO x > CoO x > FeO x > MnO x . Although encouraging progress has been made, the deficiency of highly active reactive sites, low intrinsic conductivity, and wide energy bandgap of NiO-based catalysts are still major obstacles to the replacement of OER catalysts based on precious metals. − …”