2002
DOI: 10.1364/josab.19.001480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrafast carrier-relaxation dynamics in self-assembled InAs/GaAs quantum dots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
41
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Apparently their excitation levels are below those where state filling begins to control the capture dynamics. We note that their highest intensity capture time of 0.6 ps is similar to capture times in our study and also that of Yarotski et al 45 at similar fluences.…”
Section: à2supporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Apparently their excitation levels are below those where state filling begins to control the capture dynamics. We note that their highest intensity capture time of 0.6 ps is similar to capture times in our study and also that of Yarotski et al 45 at similar fluences.…”
Section: à2supporting
confidence: 92%
“…45 Their pump fluence (0.04 mJ/cm 2 ) was in the middle of our range of fluences. From their data, they deduce an electron capture time of 0.5 ps for excitation (and probing) with 800 nm pulses.…”
Section: à2mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The preferential single-electron capture to the QD is probably influenced by the unbalanced relaxation rate of the photogenerated electrons and holes in the GaAs barrier region falling to the ground state in the QD. [40][41][42] As discussed above, the underlying carrier dynamics around the QD was successfully analyzed, and an electron-transfer process was shown to be dominant. However, from a viewpoint of quantum emitter, this process hinders the stability of excitonic states populated in the QD.…”
Section: -3mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Distinct contrast between two excitation energies was observed, i.e., X 0 line is accompanied by charged exciton emission under WL excitation, while the charged exciton emission was almost absent under barrier excitation. Further study on this behavior is now under way, but one possible Barrier excitation WL excitation X 0 X -interpretation for this observation is higher electron mobility in WL and a hindrance of hole capture into QD due to strain-induced potential barrier in a valence band [16]. For the barrier excitation, the potential barrier becomes less important and photogenerated electron-hole pair will be equally captured into QD, which will result in suppressed charged exciton formation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%