2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultra-thin Cu2ZnSnS4 solar cell by pulsed laser deposition

Abstract: We report on the fabrication of a 5.2% efficiency Cu 2 ZnSnS 4 (CZTS) solar cell made by pulsed laser deposition (PLD) featuring an ultra-thin absorber layer (less than 450 nm). Solutions to the issues of reproducibility and micro-particulate ejection often encountered with PLD are proposed. At the optimal laser fluence, amorphous CZTS precursors with optimal stoichiometry for solar cells are deposited from a single target. Such precursors do not result in detectable segregation of secondary phases after the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
60
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(84 reference statements)
4
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A composite target with the overall stoichiometric composition Cu 2 ZnSnS 4 or Cu 2 ZnSnO 4 is struck by a KrF excimer laser beam. After the deposition, the films were annealed in a graphite box with a S overpressure at a temperature ranging from 550 • C to 600 • C. Using this two-step technique, a first efficiency record of 5.2% was obtained by Cazzaniga et al in 2017 [25] and subsequent cells were completed by Gansukh et al from DTU [27]. Using PLD, one important deposition parameter turns out to be the laser energy per unit area [J cm −2 ] on the composite target.…”
Section: Pulsed Laser Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A composite target with the overall stoichiometric composition Cu 2 ZnSnS 4 or Cu 2 ZnSnO 4 is struck by a KrF excimer laser beam. After the deposition, the films were annealed in a graphite box with a S overpressure at a temperature ranging from 550 • C to 600 • C. Using this two-step technique, a first efficiency record of 5.2% was obtained by Cazzaniga et al in 2017 [25] and subsequent cells were completed by Gansukh et al from DTU [27]. Using PLD, one important deposition parameter turns out to be the laser energy per unit area [J cm −2 ] on the composite target.…”
Section: Pulsed Laser Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was the case not only for films produced from composite targets, but also for single-phase CZTS targets. For oxide targets, CZTO, it was necessary to apply a target with less copper than the standard composition [25,90].…”
Section: Pulsed Laser Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from that, kesterite has several advantageous properties to be a very suitable material for photovoltaic applications: kesterite has p‐type conductivity naturally due to intrinsic point defects; it is direct band gap semiconductor with a high absorption coefficient (~10 4 cm −1 ); its band gap can be easily tuned with the ratio S/Se, from 1.0 eV, for the pure selenium Cu 2 ZnSnSe 4 (CZTSe) compound, to 1.5 eV, for the pure sulfur Cu 2 ZnSnS 4 (CZTS); and it is highly compatible with CIGS technology, sharing several processing steps and techniques. Furthermore, the fact that kesterite absorbers can be synthesized with a large variety of techniques is another advantage to consider, especially for future industrial perspectives …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the deposition techniques, these are usually classified as vacuum (mostly physical vapor deposition [PVD]‐based) and nonvacuum techniques. Vacuum‐based methods include coevaporation, thermal evaporation, e‐beam evaporation, sputtering, or pulsed laser deposition (PLD), among the most widely used. While nonvacuum techniques include solution processing via spin‐coating/dip‐coating/doctor‐blade‐coating/spray/ink‐jet printing of the precursor, or electrochemical deposition …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation