2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.01.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultra-thick semi-crystalline photoactive donor polymer for efficient indoor organic photovoltaics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
86
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This p-type semiconductor also shows interesting properties as a red lightselective organic photodetector [24,25] and as an indoor light harvester. [26][27][28][29] The synthesis of both starting monomers requires a small number of synthetic steps, all using low-cost starting materials. M1 only requires 1 alkylation step from commercial compounds, where M2 requires 3 synthetic steps (Scheme 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This p-type semiconductor also shows interesting properties as a red lightselective organic photodetector [24,25] and as an indoor light harvester. [26][27][28][29] The synthesis of both starting monomers requires a small number of synthetic steps, all using low-cost starting materials. M1 only requires 1 alkylation step from commercial compounds, where M2 requires 3 synthetic steps (Scheme 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 8–11 ] This in turn can lead to reduced device and module costs and opens up the technology for use in a wide range of applications including building integrated photovoltaic (PV), vehicle integrated PV, mobile chargers, indoor, and internet of things applications. [ 12–23 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OPV appear to be particularly suitable for indoor application as the organic molecules absorption spectrum could be tuned to match the spectrum of indoor light sources—fluorescent lamp, cool white light emitting diode (LED) or warm white LED. [ 16–23 ] There are reports of OPV outperforming the more established silicon (Si) solar cells in indoor light conditions. [ 19–22 ] OPV cells with the more established and commercially available organic semiconductor photoactive materials, such as, P3HT:PCBM and poly[4,8‐bis(5‐(2‐ethylhexyl)thiophen‐2‐yl)benzo[1,2‐b;4,5‐b′]dithiophene‐2,6‐diyl‐alt‐(4‐(2‐ethylhexyl)‐3‐fluorothieno[3,4‐b]thiophene‐)‐2‐carboxylate‐2‐6‐diyl)] (PCE10 or PTB7‐Th):PCBM blends, used as the photoactive layer (PAL) in the devices, show efficiencies of 13 and 20% respectively under LED light condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They also have the advantage of being flexible and solution-processed, as well as having low manufacturing costs and high absorption in the visible light region [4][5][6]. These properties make them attractive options for low-power energy harvesting under indoor light sources [7,8]. Organic solar cells have also been extensively researched and, with a tandem structure, have reached nearly 14% efficiency [9], which is higher than the commercialization efficiency of 10%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%