2019
DOI: 10.3390/app9132707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultra-Small Fiber Bragg Grating Accelerometer

Abstract: Reducing the size of an accelerometer overcomes the tradeoff between its sensitivity and resonant frequency, and the theoretical relationships are analyzed. A fiber Bragg grating (FBG) accelerometer with the shortest vibration arm, 7 mm, among FBG accelerometers using the optical fiber to hold its inertial object is demonstrated here. The inertial object was 4.41 g. The experimental crest-to-trough sensitivity and resonant frequency, 244 pm/g and 90 Hz, disagree with the theoretical values, 633 pm/g and 67 Hz,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both the numerical and empirical data generated 5 Hz forcing frequency and a steady increment of base acceleration. In contrast to Li et al [13], Liu et al [14] computed the sensitivity of symmetrical bended spring plates FBG accelerometer using: (i) numerical data at a single maximum base acceleration of 1 m/s 2 at two forcing frequencies of 5 and 10 Hz; and (ii) empirical data at maximum base acceleration within the range of 1-6 m/s 2 and at forcing frequencies of 5, 10, 15, and 20 Hz (see Fig. 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both the numerical and empirical data generated 5 Hz forcing frequency and a steady increment of base acceleration. In contrast to Li et al [13], Liu et al [14] computed the sensitivity of symmetrical bended spring plates FBG accelerometer using: (i) numerical data at a single maximum base acceleration of 1 m/s 2 at two forcing frequencies of 5 and 10 Hz; and (ii) empirical data at maximum base acceleration within the range of 1-6 m/s 2 and at forcing frequencies of 5, 10, 15, and 20 Hz (see Fig. 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Meanwhile, there are two process methods for determining the sensitivity of the FBG accelerometer: (i) Prediction of the sensitivity using numerical data computed from the mathematical model of the FBG accelerometer; and (ii) Sensitivity identification using empirical data obtained from real acceleration measurement. Li et al [13] has proposed an ultrasmall FBG accelerometer and its sensitivity from the numerical and empirical data was found to be 244 pm/g and 633 pm/g, respectively. Both the numerical and empirical data generated 5 Hz forcing frequency and a steady increment of base acceleration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weight is another factor to consider in the applications of FBG based accelerometers. In 2018, Galv et al 83 developed a low-weight accelerometer for structural health monitoring in the field of aerospace by combining the FBG and Additive Manufacturing (AM) processes. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: -11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jiang et al developed a three-axis FBG accelerometer based on a pull-push mechanism and achieved a sensitivity of 0.068 V g −1 in a measured full scale of ±2.5 m s −2 [12]. Kuo et al designed an ultra-small FBG accelerometer with a vibration arm of 7 mm and achieved a sensitivity of 633 pm g −1 FBG wavelength shift at 67 Hz [13]. Liu et al designed a high sensitivity FBG-based accelerometer exhibiting a flat frequency response up to 441 Hz and a crossaxis sensitivity of less than 3.6% [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%