2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultra-short term heart rate variability as a tool to assess changes in valence

Abstract: Heart rate variability (HRV) is an index that has been extensively used in fields such as clinical cardiology, psychiatry, and psychology to assess affective experiences. Although traditionally The European Society of Cardiology and The North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology recommended to use either a recording length of 24-h (long-term) or five minutes (short-term), recent advances in the field have suggested the use of ultra-short term (< 5 min) HRV measurements. In this study, we investigat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results showed that DFA α 1 as a non-linear index of HRV did not distinguish the different affective image regimes under ultra-short recordings. Although previous work showed that there can be differences in HRV measures when comparing neutral and arousing sessions ( Valenza et al, 2012 ) or watching positive and negative videos ( Barquero-Pérez et al, 2020 ; Ghiasi et al, 2020 ), our findings are consistent with other works that showed the linear HRV metric RMSSD did not distinguish between positive and negative emotions using IAPS ( Schippers et al, 2018 ), and non-linear HRV metric DFA α 1 did not distinguish different emotionally arousing settings ( Marín-Morales et al, 2021 ). We hypothesize that because pure regime participants knew to expect images of the same type, there may not have been a sufficient change in emotional context to create significant variation in their heart rate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our results showed that DFA α 1 as a non-linear index of HRV did not distinguish the different affective image regimes under ultra-short recordings. Although previous work showed that there can be differences in HRV measures when comparing neutral and arousing sessions ( Valenza et al, 2012 ) or watching positive and negative videos ( Barquero-Pérez et al, 2020 ; Ghiasi et al, 2020 ), our findings are consistent with other works that showed the linear HRV metric RMSSD did not distinguish between positive and negative emotions using IAPS ( Schippers et al, 2018 ), and non-linear HRV metric DFA α 1 did not distinguish different emotionally arousing settings ( Marín-Morales et al, 2021 ). We hypothesize that because pure regime participants knew to expect images of the same type, there may not have been a sufficient change in emotional context to create significant variation in their heart rate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…rejected Choi et al. 's claim by stating RMSSD measured with a 30s moving window cannot discern between positive and negative emotions with IAPS images (Schippers et al., 2018). In line with Schippers et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimating HRV measures on the basis of such relatively short observation windows recently gained interest as it allows to study HRV changes with a higher temporal resolution compared to standard window lengths (Shaffer and Ginsberg, 2017). Several studies showed that such ultra-short-term HRV measures highly correlate with the clinically accepted short-term measures computed over a standard window length of five minutes (Munoz et al, 2015, Schippers et al, 2018, Castaldo et al, 2019.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%