2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2014.09.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultra-sensitive determination of cyanide in surface water by gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry after derivatization with 2-(dimethylamino)ethanethiol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(76 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Mottier et al ( 2010 ) China 98.38 μg/cig. Xu et al ( 2006 ) Water Surface water Korea (Gum River) 1.01 ± 0.03 μg/L Kang and Shin ( 2014 ) 0.77 mg/L Dadfarnia et al ( 2007 ) Brazil 25–50 μg/L Frizzarin and Rocha ( 2013 ) China Wan et al ( 2015 ) Italy 5.11 μg/L Giuriati et al ( 2004 ) Drinking water USA (Sunnyvale) <LOD Christinson and Rohrer ( 2007 ) USA (San Jose) <LOD Sweden Themelis et al ( 2009 ) Iran <LOD Absalan et al ( 2010 ) Tap water Iran 0.6 μg/L Abbasi et al ( 2010 ) Wastewater Petrochemical sludge 6.1–63.5 μg/L Dadfarnia et al ( 2007 ) Electroplating waste 0.04–1.2 μg/mL Hassan et al ( 2007 ) Petrochemical sludge 4600.2 μg/L Abbasi et al ( 2010 ) Gold cyanidation solution 540 mg/L Breuer et al ( 2011 ) Industrial wastewater Noroozifar et al ( 2011 ) Soil Japan ...…”
Section: Cyanide Occurrence In the Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Mottier et al ( 2010 ) China 98.38 μg/cig. Xu et al ( 2006 ) Water Surface water Korea (Gum River) 1.01 ± 0.03 μg/L Kang and Shin ( 2014 ) 0.77 mg/L Dadfarnia et al ( 2007 ) Brazil 25–50 μg/L Frizzarin and Rocha ( 2013 ) China Wan et al ( 2015 ) Italy 5.11 μg/L Giuriati et al ( 2004 ) Drinking water USA (Sunnyvale) <LOD Christinson and Rohrer ( 2007 ) USA (San Jose) <LOD Sweden Themelis et al ( 2009 ) Iran <LOD Absalan et al ( 2010 ) Tap water Iran 0.6 μg/L Abbasi et al ( 2010 ) Wastewater Petrochemical sludge 6.1–63.5 μg/L Dadfarnia et al ( 2007 ) Electroplating waste 0.04–1.2 μg/mL Hassan et al ( 2007 ) Petrochemical sludge 4600.2 μg/L Abbasi et al ( 2010 ) Gold cyanidation solution 540 mg/L Breuer et al ( 2011 ) Industrial wastewater Noroozifar et al ( 2011 ) Soil Japan ...…”
Section: Cyanide Occurrence In the Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visually, the image of the population did not change over the survey days. Compared to the 100 and 500 µL samples, the population isolated in the 1000 µL sample was slightly larger from the start of the study, and at the time of the largest "jump" (around day [14][15], the size difference between the 100 and 500 µL and 1000 µL populations was as much as 10,000 particles.…”
Section: Variantmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Pollution is caused by industrial sewage (electroplating plants, coking plants, gasworks, metal processing plants, etc.). These are very toxic compounds, and the sewage in which they are present should not be discharged into surface water reservoirs [14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linear working range of this system was between 40–1200 ng/mL with an LOD value of 20 ng/mL [38] . Another study reported the derivatization of for cyanide in surface water using 2‐dimethylamino)ethanethiol, coupled with a highly sensitive gas chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry (GC‐MS/MS) system, which recorded an LOD value of 0.02 ng/mL [39] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[38] Another study reported the derivatization of for cyanide in surface water using 2-dimethylamino)ethanethiol, coupled with a highly sensitive gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) system, which recorded an LOD value of 0.02 ng/mL. [39] The method proposed in this study for the determination of cyanide does not require complicated derivatization steps, but involves a very simple, uncomplicated and practical process.…”
Section: Analytical Figures Of Meritmentioning
confidence: 96%